posted in Technology
New Twitter launches, says Musk's X gave up the name
Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/new-twitter-launches-says-musks-x-gave-up-the-name/posted in Technology
New Twitter launches, says Musk's X gave up the name
Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/new-twitter-launches-says-musks-x-gave-up-the-name/Replying to @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
I hope this takes off and people start using “tweet” and “twitter” again and it makes “x” completely irrelevant like his Hitler salute should have
Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out
Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out
…As a “founder”; we’ll see how long that lasts
but til then at least, I’m out too
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out
Well, they need something to pay the lawyers with once Musk takes notice.
Edit: I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article” and found out that they’ve already been sued, though it’s still not entirely settled.
I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”
Spread the word my brother! You’ve got to let everyone know about this new fad!
I read it but honestly, probably 80% of the time I do not. Because articles are very often full of pop ups and ads and tracking and paywalls, and are unnecessarily verbose (most can be summarized in 1-2 sentences), and are just republishing someone else’s work while adding nothing, and simultaneously devoid of useful information or any actual sources.
Some of that can be solved with Firefox and unblock.
100% can be solved by knowingly making a glaringly obviously false claim about the topic and someone will correct you in a dickish tone while citing the article
Replying to @BooBees@fedinsfw.app
Works for me 😏
Your grandad’s AI summary, if you will.
Replying to @huey_m@piefed.social
I’ve seen AI summaries that looked like the AI had not read the article.
In fairness, that could be said of some of the know-it-all summaries as well. 😅
I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”
What dark magic is this
Replying to @antonim@lemmy.world
I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”
This is liberal propaganda FAKE NEWS
How do I learn this power?
Replying to @Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
This here is an excellent guide:
Replying to @antonim@lemmy.world
Edit: I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”
Jokes aside: I think it’s great that you read the article, then went back to both acknowledge that it covered your point and admit that you didn’t before.
Replying to @antonim@lemmy.world
I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”
Wait. Is that allowed?
Are we sure it’s not mostly still bots on Twitter? I deleted my account back then and have not been back.
At least, not willingly back, since some people still hyperlink to Twitter directly rather than just sharing screenshots of whatever the content was. So you click the text hyperlink thinking it’s to a web article, only for it to bring you to some random string of tweets visibly displayed in the least logical order.
Oh I’m positive it’s mainly bots and morons on x
Sounds like a grift.
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out
They probably need the money to pay for their AI-based “fact-checking”:
A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.
Using a technology that’s known for making shit up, for fact-checking, is so dumb, but it will probably bring in investors because AI.
Every tweet
Poop emoji - this has been fact checked but can not be independently verified due to lack of context
Do they expect everything posted to be just news and information that can be fact-checked? Is this AI going to fact-check my opinions and shitposts too?
The homepage feels like AI slop too.
Replying to @norkoris@lemmy.today
AI is very good at classification
Replying to @norkoris@lemmy.today
“I just watched movie. It sucked!”
“Beep boop. According to trustworthy, verifiable sources, movie does not suck. Sanction : immediate ban.”
Dude reread that post.
“I hope this takes off and makes the Nazi platform irrelevent….but not for $20. I’m okay with Nazis for $20.”
I’m poor.
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
Same. I’m not calling you cheap. I’m pointing out that saying $20 to pop a Nazi’s balloon shouldn’t be an offensive ask.
Replying to @muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
Yeah, everyone is outraged at being a product when using free services, but then also outraged at paid ones.
I’m a bit suspicious of how they want to implement scoring, I feel like it’s either going to be gamed by users or rigged by owners, but otherwise it looks fine as an idea and as a replacement for xitter
Replying to @muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
Given that it’s charging an entry fee right now, and is VC backed and corpo controlled…
Probably a fash - or at least neoliberal - app already. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy’s enemy, no more and no less.
Replying to @SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Let them eat eachother.
Replying to @muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
$20 isn’t just $20 in most countries around the world.
For some it is more than they can make in a month. Tho those people probably never seen the Internet.
Replying to @muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
I hope that Mastodon takes off and makes the Nazi platform irrelevant. For free. Independently of corporate and investor goodwill.
what what term do people use for tweets on shitter now? just “posts”?
Xhit
Replying to @mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
Tweets
Replying to @mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
x-crete
vibe coded slop asking for $20 bucks to sign up… i think I’m okay
That site was blocked by spectrum when I tried it
Replying to @printerhell@lemmy.today
Lol
You can’t pay me enough to click on that link.
Replying to @zeezee@slrpnk.net
Oh fuck this is embarrassing
Replying to @zeezee@slrpnk.net
Probably a pre-emptive block to stop scam sites from using domain that are similar.
Replying to @zeezee@slrpnk.net
I don’t think I’ve ever seen that many em dashes ever. Not even in the most copy/paste AI slop wall of text. Holy moly.
Replying to @Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Wow you were not kidding. Some of them are extra awkward and unnatural too. It’s almost a parody of what slop text looks like.
We believe people should have more control over what they see — and more transparency about the information in front of them.
An early illustration of the idea — you decide how much low-trust noise reaches your feed:
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
people start using “tweet” and “twitter” again
I never stopped
Replying to @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
No one else did either
Replying to @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
I called it X-twitter. I didn’t really use “tweet” though; mostly because I tend to talk about toots more than tweets.
Replying to @luciferofastora@feddit.org
I tend to talk about my toots after I eat a can of spicy chili beans right out the can
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
it cost $20 to join?
Shit, that’s twice as much as it used to cost to join Something Awful, and I bet you don’t even get access to furry porno.
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
I’d still be hesitant if they paid me 20$ to join.
Replying to @mrmisses@lemmy.world
it cost $20 to join?! I’m out
Yep, I can’t spend the money now, which is probably true for a lot of people, and I’m definitely gonna forget this is a thing by the time it’s free or I have the money, which is probably true for a lot of people.