PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

some_guy@some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
⁨12⁩d

New Twitter launches, says Musk's X gave up the name

Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/new-twitter-launches-says-musks-x-gave-up-the-name/
6810841
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
emoji3
mrmisses@mrmisses@lemmy.world
edited⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org⁩

I hope this takes off and people start using “tweet” and “twitter” again and it makes “x” completely irrelevant like his Hitler salute should have

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out

12000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
antonim@antonim@lemmy.world
edited⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨mrmisses@lemmy.world⁩

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out

Well, they need something to pay the lawyers with once Musk takes notice.

Edit: I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article” and found out that they’ve already been sued, though it’s still not entirely settled.

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
treadful@treadful@lemmy.zip
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”

Spread the word my brother! You’ve got to let everyone know about this new fad!

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
artyom@artyom@piefed.social
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

I read it but honestly, probably 80% of the time I do not. Because articles are very often full of pop ups and ads and tracking and paywalls, and are unnecessarily verbose (most can be summarized in 1-2 sentences), and are just republishing someone else’s work while adding nothing, and simultaneously devoid of useful information or any actual sources.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
KyuubiNoKitsune@KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Some of that can be solved with Firefox and unblock.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
BooBees@BooBees@fedinsfw.app
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

100% can be solved by knowingly making a glaringly obviously false claim about the topic and someone will correct you in a dickish tone while citing the article

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
huey_m@huey_m@piefed.social
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Your grandad’s AI summary, if you will.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
brsrklf@brsrklf@jlai.lu
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨huey_m@piefed.social⁩

I’ve seen AI summaries that looked like the AI had not read the article.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
huey_m@huey_m@piefed.social
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

In fairness, that could be said of some of the know-it-all summaries as well. 😅

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨27⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨22:02⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs