PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

return2ozma@return2ozma@lemmy.world
⁨5⁩d

I rented a car, and within hours, my driver's license was for sale

arstechnica.com/security/2026/09/my-drivers-license-is-one-of-153-million-for-sale-on-a-new-dark-website/
2010842
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Darkard@Darkard@lemmy.world
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨return2ozma@lemmy.world⁩

But don’t forget guys, uploading your government IDs to any old fucking website to prove your age is very safe and protects children. There’s no way this could go wrong and everyone in the supply chain is very trustworthy

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Saapas@Saapas@piefed.zip
⁨5⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

The QR/one time code way makes a lot more sense and avoids this issue

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
BooBees@BooBees@fedinsfw.app
⁨5⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

How about we just don’t suck the dicks of authoritarian wannabe dipshits that have proven they can’t secure any information properly and can’t run any institution properly?

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Saapas@Saapas@piefed.zip
⁨5⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

I don’t know exactly what you mean, I just think for age gating there’s ways that are a lot better

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
ramble81@ramble81@lemmy.zip
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨Saapas@piefed.zip⁩

That’s the issue. We don’t need nanny’s to age gate us on the internet. All it does is create a very short path to removing anonymity on the internet

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Saapas@Saapas@piefed.zip
⁨5⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Don’t mind some age gating tbh. It would have to be pretty convenient and anonymous though.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
maccentric@maccentric@sh.itjust.works
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨Saapas@piefed.zip⁩

How do you imagine it will be anonymous? Or convenient, for that matter.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Dnb@Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨maccentric@sh.itjust.works⁩

Easy. You set the age in the os (or age range) per system account.

Apps can then request this and allow/ deny based on it. Requires admin / sudo to update age range.

No need for 3rd parties, id or anything else.

If parents are concerned about it they can implement it easily. If not, they can ignore it.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Don't forget to stay hydrated.🍉🍉🍉🍉🍉@testaccount789@sh.itjust.works
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

But it needs to be verified there first in some way, and then services will need to somehow verify that your device properly verified it.

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨3⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨16:40⁩en
2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
BooBees@BooBees@fedinsfw.app
edited⁨5⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

And which of those systems are secure themselves, oses and their manufacturers - the answer is none. None are secure enough to trust that private information on mandatory verification systems. Not the base systems nor any systems that would share any approval tokens.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Dnb@Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨testaccount789@sh.itjust.works⁩

Why does it need to be verified? If the parents set it up as an adult they can’t be mad when its treated as an adult?

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
WhyJiffie@WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
⁨4⁩d

Replying to @⁨Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

that’s how we get to the point that the parents need to be made accountable. the only correct answer.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs