posted in Technology
GM Admits It Needs Hybrids Again: 'We're Not Tone Deaf'
www.motor1.com/news/811086/general-motors-hybrids-comeback-plan/posted in Technology
GM Admits It Needs Hybrids Again: 'We're Not Tone Deaf'
www.motor1.com/news/811086/general-motors-hybrids-comeback-plan/Replying to @Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club
Too bad American car companies. I already learned my lesson buying your cheap junk. Never again.
Replying to @Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world
Cheap junk?? American cars are very expensive junk.
Say what you want about GM, they didn’t have to put the same V8 into pretty much everything, and now that they don’t, how are teenagers going to get their hands on a 4L V8 so detuned it makes the same power as an engine 1/3 the size for like $4000 that was only ever driven by grandma?
Replying to @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
I take cheap to mean poor quality and/or cheap for them to buy or produce (versus the customer).
Replying to @undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
Assuming you’re esl:
Cheap doesn’t mean low quality, it means low price, which can imply low quality, but it doesn’t work if the thing’s not also cheap.
You could call US cars cheaply-made junk.
Replying to @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
I’m a native US English speaker and use both definitions. I’m on a Swiss instance because I don’t like hosting my data in 14 Eyes countries.
If I think your product is shit, I’ll oftentimes call it cheap — especially if it looks like you manufactured it cheaply and then sold it for a high price for a huge profit.
Replying to @undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
An expensive product can’t be cheap. It can be cheaply made, but a cheap expensive thing is an oxymoron.
It can still be cheap junk even if you overpaid.
You don’t have a monopoly on the English language.
Replying to @sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
Nobody would say “I wouldn’t buy a Cybertruck, they’re so cheap”, if they did, you’d probably go “Haha they’re like 6 figures new!”, thinking the person assumed that because Teslas look cheap they actually are.