posted in Technology

Sony Reminds PS Users They Don't Own Digital Games

The relevant section is blunt. “The Software is licensed to you, not sold,” the EULA states. “You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, and personal license to play or use the Software for your private, non-commercial use on the system or device it was intended for.”

The terms also restrict renting, modifying, or obtaining games through unauthorised means. Nothing in there is new, technically. Sony’s EULA has always said this. The timing is what makes it land differently right now.

games.gg/news/sony-eula-email-psblackout-boycott/
Sony Reminds PS Users They Don't Own Digital GamesGAMES.GGSony Reminds PS Users They Don't Own Digital GamesSony's unsolicited EULA email tells PlayStation users their digital games are licensed, not owned, arriving just as the #PSBlackout boycott kicks off.

Replying to @⁨SnoringEarthworm@piefed.ca⁩

It’s in the EULA for every piece of software, including physical.

If it wasn’t, then buying a single copy would legally allow you to sell an infinite amount of copies.

Because that’s what actually owning software means.

And video games are software.

PlayStation:

The Software is licensed to you, not sold

Windows 95:

The software product is licensed, not sold

www.scribd.com/…/Windows-95-License-Agreement

I know it’s a joke no one ever read them…

But you all really never knew this?

Edit:

Don’t make me wheel out the 1980s CRT TV for the class…

www.youtube.com/watch?v=up863eQKGUI

There’s always been freeware and shareware (yes, they’re different) but if you as an individual paid money for software at any point, you’ve never owned it.

Businesses can’t even justify the expense of “owning” basic stuff like Microsoft Office and collectively spend billions. “Owning” software is fucking expensive, and usually means you coded it.

Windows 95 License AgreementScribdWindows 95 License Agreement | PDF | Operating System | LicenseScribd is the source for 300M+ user uploaded documents and specialty resources.

Replying to an earlier post

If it wasn’t, then buying a single copy would legally allow you to sell an infinite amount of copies.

Because that’s what actually owning software means.

This. Is. A. FUCKING. Lie.

If I buy and own a physical copy of a book. I am not then entitled to set up a printing press and sell my own word-for-word copies of said book. Same applies to ownership of digital goods.

If I go to GOG and buy a DRM free game (aka I would then own that copy) I still wouldn’t have the legal right to distribute copies to other people.

That’s because copyright laws exist, and they apply to both situations I described. Shame on you for mindlessly repeating industry lies.