sprinkle in a bit of AI into the mix and now it’s not only more expensive, but also highly regressive.

My stand up Jack can go just as fast. The problem isn’t top speed, it’s acceleration and breaking. It’s being able to rip around a warehouse building orders quickly and efficiently. A dude with a stand up Jack and a voxcoder can beat most robots.

The company this post is referring to doesn’t have bots moving around a warehouse designed for humans. They built a whole building with shelves and space designed for the robots.

I promise you, the throughout is tremendously higher than humans alone. The bots can get up to roughly 45mph in a few seconds and break to a full stop in the same amount of time. I know this because I work in this space, the system is fast

And it actually works? They can’t even figure out how to make vending machines that don’t cause a log-jam.

I work for warehouse automation too. It absolutely works. Its just very carefully, meticulously planned. Every tiny edge case is accounted for. Hell. We measure the floor for difference in height to the mm where 3 is a big issue.

Thats kind of the whole problem with robots as tools. They can be incredibly fast and precise but if something is just slightly out of expected alignment they tear themselves apart (or kill someone nearby).

Same could be said for using a saw, or electricity.

If its designed correctly, conforms to safety requirements, there is no real risk to human health.

Of course a not can always crash, but that should be accounted for and tested against much like go carts on a track

Yep it works. When it’s running one of these things can push, not joking, millions of cases through a single warehouse a day.

Ever notice that the top end speed of the non riding ones, the ones that you walk behind, us just a little beyond a comfortable walking pace? Always found that curious. Not quite running, but certainly not walking either. Hips would hurt at the end of a shift.

Unfortunately robots are not able to think critically

They don’t need to. No more than a conveyor needs to think critically.

I think people are envisioning the robots moving through a warehouse that was built for humans. That is not the case.

Special purpose warehouses are built with the robots in mind. The bots don’t need to navigate an uncontrolled environment as the environment was meant for them.

It’s basically a really big, really performant conveyor belt.

Complexity is expensive.

Expensive isn’t really an issue though is it?

If I can guarantee you quadruple your revenue by doubling your expense, you’d take the deal no? That’s basically what these things do.

To be a bit more precise, is it about throughput or lead time? Because for throughput I imagine you can just have more workers, but for quicker shipping you need to do pick and pack in less time, rather than do a lot of them in a given time.

Throughput primarily, the bottleneck is still shipping. These systems do allow for picking/packing faster as well but from a logistics standpoint if you want more output you just need more trucks.

How does it help in getting more revenue then? Demand wouldn’t change, right?

Businesses tend to bank on demand for products being functionally infinite over the long term. Because of this it tends to be a safe bet that you’ll make more money the quicker, and cheaper, you can get products on shelves.

This has held pretty true thus far, though personally I have to wonder if there’s an upper limit. Human’s have to have a upper tolerance for buying junk right?

In this scenario, as you said it’s not making the delivery quicker, is it right to assume that it’s making it cheaper? Is the cost of warehousing lower with robots?