Replying to @FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
What the fuck? I can’t believe this headline. Does anyone have this article without paywall?

Replying to @FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
What the fuck? I can’t believe this headline. Does anyone have this article without paywall?
Replying to @GreenShimada@lemmy.world
Mac OS and OSX seem to be reported separately apparently because many browsers don’t distinguish them?
Just something I read on Reddit, not sure if true.
Replying to @amarynthia@sh.itjust.works
Thanks for sharing. I keep underestimating the evil intent of these companies…
Replying to @amarynthia@sh.itjust.works
Hmm, I also hate US Big Tech, but do you have any source for your claims?
Replying to @TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
Chat control never had majority support, indeed. Still, Chat Control Light is in effect right now. Not making the EU looks very democratic.
Replying to @Womble@piefed.world
EU is bi-polar. Making some of the best regulations (GDPR, AI Act…) and then suddenly fucking people over with stuff like Chat Control.
Replying to @deadcream@sopuli.xyz
Do you know any artists trying to make a living?
Replying to @cenzorrll@piefed.ca
Thank you. I like the GPL idea more, to be honest.
Replying to @deadcream@sopuli.xyz
Are you for real?
What does this mean? Can someone explain in simple terms?
Replying to @Mondez@lemdro.id
No idea. The whole copyright topic is a clusterfuck when it comes to LLMs. The matter of the fact is: most AI companies steal data to train their models and they don’t care about licenses or copyrights.
Replying to @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
👆👆👆
Replying to @inari@piefed.zip
This guy is full of shit.
Let me rephrase his points:
Who the fuck gives Anthropic the right to use all that training data for their model?! And if other companies distill their models, THEY are to be protected by laws?! Cry me a fucking river.
Replying to @General_Effort@lemmy.world
Just because a law mislabels something doesn’t mean we need/should follow that.
Replying to @wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Hmm well, okay. Then Codeberg isn’t for me.
Replying to @wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
What do you mean?
Replying to @wewbull@feddit.uk
They won’t ever be able to compete with GitHub or GitLab like this…
Replying to @eicker@lemmy.world
I think it’s important to note that these models are open-WEIGHT and not open-SOURCE. Open-source would mean we could explore the training data itself. Open-weight models are great, but please let’s not call them open-source.
Replying to @E_coli42@lemmy.world
What’s the definition of cryptocurrency-RELATED? Who defines what this all includes? Bad decision by codeberg…