Replying to @⁨General_Effort@lemmy.world⁩

I’d argue that this news is over-blown. The project has more than a solid and honorable track record with insanely talented engineers behind it. AI is a new technology that is not going anywhere. I would put my faith into their decisions to improve this project by whatever means they think are best.

The truth is most commenters are not technically skilled to evaluate or critique their decisions. If GOS team, who again would be at the top % in the field, feel that this can elevate the project, should we not give them the benefit of the doubt?

Replying to @⁨Bronzor@lemmy.ml⁩

Sure you can. Because in this case Pandora’s box is something which exists solely through a sustained, inconceivable amount of money being continuously funneled into it without any guaranteed long term benefit to the people who do so. It’s a technology which isn’t sold as a product as it exists in its current form, but a theoretical future form.

If the bottom were to fall out from under it tomorrow, it couldn’t even continue to exist as it is now, it would disappear entirely as there would be no financial incentive to keep it running. Individuals could still run what we have now offline, but its value and usefulness would degrade rapidly as time went on, because it relies on mass-scale power consumption and data theft to remain up to date, much less improve.

Replying to @⁨Bronzor@lemmy.ml⁩

So where are all the 3D TVs? Where’s the Nintendo Virtual Boy? Betamax? Google Wave? Google+? NFTs?

Oh not transformational enough?

Ok then how long did it take electric vehicles to come back after The fossil fuel industry killed them in like 1920?

Oh here’s a good one: thalidomide. That one went away for good.

How about the hole in the ozone layer?

Sorry, AI is only a foregone conclusion because apparently everyone’s had their consent beautifully manufactured to an extreme degree.

Replying to @⁨EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world⁩

It’s not going anywhere because it’s already been here for a very long time, you just didn’t know about it

What people call “AI” is just Machine Learning.

Chatbots, OCR, Text-to-Speech, Speech-to-Text, Computer Vision, Web Search, Spam filtering or Fraud detection, Personalized ADs, even your phone’s camera processing algorithm.

It’s all Machine Learning, but now under new and fancy “AI” name. And it’s been here for decades.

The reason it blew up this much only now is because people realized that the more data you feed into it, the better the output becomes. And so they started exploring it more, to the extent of causing valid ethical concerns.

Replying to @⁨Mniot@programming.dev⁩

Pointing to a wiki page instead of actually explaining stuff isn’t going to change my mind.

Now, if you’re talking specifically about LLMs, however (which you could’ve just said so, ffs). I think their scope of application and resources wasted on them will be significantly reduced. Look at what happened to blockchains and NFT. Basically, I expect the same to happen here.

Replying to @⁨Mistic@lemmy.world⁩

The conversation we’re having doesn’t involve the place of irrelevance you’re trying to pull it to.

It’s not bitching about AI, it’s a conversation that’s different from the one that you’re trying to have.

I’m not trying to shame you, I’m just letting you know that the weird semantic sidebar you’re trying to start is irrelevant to what’s being discussed. We don’t have to stop what we’re doing and explain this to you just because you’re demanding it.

Replying to @⁨EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world⁩

Then why do you keep engaging with me after I’ve said my piece?

If you’re talking about the link guy, that’s not helping. Usually, people do that just to be a smart ass, especially on tech forums with their “go read the manual.” Yikes to those guys. Besides, they weren’t “blown off” as you said, there was also proper response if you read the comment once more.

The other people who were responding to me were actually quite reasonable, it’s mainly you I have had issues with.

Replying to @⁨EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world⁩

Machine learning isn’t going anywhere.

As someone who despises the current slop hype with a passion, you’re correct on this. But only when you exclude LLMs. Because they are garbage with a net negative for mankind. Machine learning as a field however has very useful applications. Typically such that complement human assessment of data, e.g. re-viewing radiology images to flag potentially anomalous images for a second doctor to look at - not in place of the first doctor.

Replying to @⁨Mistic@lemmy.world⁩

LLMs use a new way of data processing (focused on language rules) which is what brought the boost. Not more training data. More training data is needed for an LLM to reach “maturity” but it also increases cost due to resource usage. And current LLMs have already absorbed basically all of the internet and most books, and since the internet is now full of slop, more unpoisoned training data does not exist. That’s why more does not help anymore.