Replying to @⁨eicker@lemmy.world⁩

I stripped danced for someone who I wasn’t sure of their identity online to Ariana Grande’s Into You even tho I am a fat guy. I think its hilarious. I told all my friends about my “risky” performance art. I think the rule should be based on what you are willing to defend if literally everyone can and does see it. I’m unusual in that as long as it isn’t illegal or morally repulsive in my moral philosophy then I will defend it to my grave. However, that doesn’t mean it’s always convenient. If Trump’s thought taught me one thing though is you should take responsibility for truly bad things you’ve done, which Trump doesn’t do, but he taught me that shamelessness works. So, if there are Nazis in the government, throwing people in fucking cages, concentration camps, then shit. If me dancing to an Ariana Grande song, stripping my clothes off, acting ridiculous, as a fat guy jiggling around, offends somebody, they can politely fuck off.

Anyway now I have a GF that adores me and likes my weird. 🤣

Share weird things with friends, and if they don’t like it, maybe they weren’t a friend that was fit for you. If you chat with hosted AI system just know you might end up with more “friends” looking at it than all the actual friends you know. Haha best to keep in mind.

Also shout out to John Waters and Pink Flamingos and Divine. Filth is my life. Filth are my politics.

Replying to an earlier post

I wonder if they will adapt. People who are ignorant of how computers, software, and the internet work run into massive problems now, often without even realizing it. Making computers seem esoteric and difficult to understand serves the interest of those who would use those tools to scam, deceive, or otherwise manipulate people. I know it was a dizzying amount of information back when I got my degree, and it’s only gotten more complex since then. I’m sure there are a ton of people who wish they knew more but don’t know how.

A ton of adults in the US struggle with basic arithmetic, not because they’re stupid, but because they were never taught properly. They don’t try to learn, because there aren’t a ton of resources for adults at that level and it’s very embarrassing for an adult to ask for help with 8th grade (US grade for 12-13 years olds) math.

I’m going to have to do some research on this. The better adults (and children) who had shitty schools growing up can fill the gaps in their education, the harder it will be for billionaires to trick them with fancy gadgets like LLMs. Seems like a problem worth trying to address. The only thing I know off the top of my head is Khan Academy, and it’s been years since I used that, I don’t know if it’s any good nowadays. Regardless, the current state of affairs is obviously… suboptimal.

Replying to an earlier post

Yeah, it’s a colossal problem. One of the cool things about the internet is it allows for the decoupling of education from government or corporate power, at least as far as the internet itself can be decoupled from government or corporate power (an ongoing and also colossal problem), but it requires that people who need education 1) have physical access to education, 2) can locate the educational resources that they need, in the order they need them, and 3) are able and willing to seek out and take advantage of the resources available to them.

I’m not even sure how to start, it’s such a massive undertaking. But I think the more we can make education freely available and accessible on the internet, the better off the earth will be.

Replying to @⁨queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone⁩

If there’s the demand, and I bet that there will be, someone is going to be making plug-and-play local AI compute boxes once prices come down that eliminate a lot of the learning curve. Like, preconfigured software and all that.

Joe User is not going to be talking about memory bandwidth or compiling software or setting sampler parameters. But—as the cloud guys demonstrate—he can use it if it’s set up. And there will be more-approachable front ends and such.

Replying to an earlier post

Maybe, I’m not really sure that’s competitive while the principal value prop of LLM tools is mass surveillance / advertising. I suppose commodity on-prem LLMs could become a thing after the current bubble pops and we scrape an economy together from the rubble. Maybe there’s a slice of people who understand the costs of trusting cloud LLMs (which would, I hope, be higher post-pop), but also lack the expertise to set up and run their own on-prem LLM, that would be interested in something like that.

I think demand for privacy-respecting (and creator-respecting) tools can be driven up by increasing global technical literacy. That would also, hopefully, increase the number of people able to create and maintain their own free tools, and decrease the ability of data slurpers to bilk ignorant people.

Replying to @⁨daggermoon@piefed.world⁩

Use a local model

I also think that local models are generally preferable, but everyone having a local model requires more hardware, since much of the time the local hardware to run the local model is probably going to be idle, whereas hardware in the cloud can be servicing User B when it’s not servicing User A.

In 2026 and 2027, absent some very unexpected development, memory prices are going to be elevated.

And while some people could get local hardware, we couldn’t build a comparable-to-what-someone-could-get-in-the-cloud AI compute box for everyone if everyone wanted to go local, not for years, as we don’t have the memory production capacity today. If everyone tried to get a local box for AI compute at the same time, it’d just do what happened when the cloud companies did it, but at greater scale, because it’d require even more memory. There’d be a new memory shortage. Prices on memory would keep rising, pricing would-be buyers out, until the number of buyers still willing to buy was equal to what supply was present.

Replying to @⁨Croquette@sh.itjust.works⁩

My big concern is ad based malware, cache poisoning attacks, etc. I always use Firefox with ublock or Brave at min on those sites. Ironically we’ll probably kill all the free ones doing it but maybe for the best they go away anyhow. Mostly stolen content and non-consensual uploads. Anyone who hangs just in Pornhub is a total normie at this point so I ain’t even talking about Pornhub here. 🤣

Replying to @⁨eicker@lemmy.world⁩

How this can become public:

You are dumb enough to use the share feature.

No leaks so far. But it is of course always a possibility. As it is with almost any other web service.

How this can get accessed by others without being explicitly public to everyone:

  • Law enforcement, the justice system, and intelligence agencies
  • Your conversations will be used for training LLMs of at least the company whose LLM you’re using. Data deals with others are a possibility.

Replying to @⁨cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

The problem with that is the vast majority have no idea how pervasive and oppressive surveillance capitalism truly is. If they knew that the data from their various devices and services was being aggregated by thousands of data brokers, and could be used by employers to pay them lower wages, or businesses to charge them higher prices, or insurance to deny them healthcare, or cyber criminals to scam them, most would be genuinely shocked that most of this shit is “legal”.

The other problem is that there’s no way to opt out of techno fascism. They are free to stalk you for profit and there’s nothing you can do about it. Even if you live in a faraday cage they’ll still amass data on you. It’s hard to take a moral stance when you think they’re gonna fuck you every which way regardless.

Replying to @⁨WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world⁩

I agree they’d probably be shocked but I honestly don’t know if that would be enough to motivate them to do something about it.

The Flock pushback isn’t about the surveillance for most. It’s a NIMBY problem.

The data center backlash is the same. They don’t want it in their town. They don’t care if it’s regulated or not so long as it’s not them dealing with the consequences (air pollution, imminent domain seizure of property, noise pollution, higher prices for utilities etc).

This is why campaigns against them aren’t national and organized. This is why they haven’t started a lobby group to petition the federal government to do anything to regulate them. They think they can nip this in the bud for their town and it’ll be good enough.

Replying to @⁨eicker@lemmy.world⁩

@eicker People are idiots. It's become rather commonplace for "how to hide a body" to be in the search history of the killer shortly after a person goes missing (and is later found dead).

IIRC, Nina Reiser's killer was caught doing something like that, and the links he followed told investigators what to look for (lye) in the carpet in the family vehicle.

If you _have_ to use an LLM*, at least use one that runs locally.

*: Please don't it is making you dumber.

Replying to @⁨BoydStephenSmithJr@hachyderm.io⁩

Well, imagine you’ve done something and have to hide it.

If it’s spontaneous and you haven’t prepared, it will seem natural to expect that your search history might not be checked if nobody will suspect you personally.

And you need some way to avoid said suspicion.

People are not idiots, people just don’t understand how transparent today’s world really is. (Most likely this would be a surprise even for you.)

And also murderers specifically might be of the “emotionally unbalanced ASPD” kind of people.

Replying to @⁨jj4211@lemmy.world⁩

Yeah, this is where I would say someone definitely shouldn’t share that information because it doesn’t have to be scanned through, it doesn’t have to be broken into, stolen or anything. It just has to be the court provides a subpoena for the data and they get it. And it becomes evidence. And possibly a confession in writing 😅

FBI guy that stole all that money figured that out. After he was caught they got his chat logs and it detailed criminal conspiracy to move to Portugal with all the money he stole. The crazy part to me is he was supposedly counterintelligence which… 💩