PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

themachinestops@themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨7⁩d

Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice

lists.debian.org/debian-project/…/msg00041.html

www.xda-developers.com/linus-used-ai-bug-llm-critics-face-choice/
5210418
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Julio Eusebio@Moztako@lemmus.org
⁨6⁩d

Replying to @⁨themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

It’s interesting to see AI being used for something as practical as debugging a Linux issue. I think the bigger question is how much developers can rely on AI without losing their understanding of the underlying code. AI can clearly speed things up, but human review still seems essential.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
FiniteBanjo@FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
⁨6⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

“Speed up” implies the outputs are the same, so I disagree with that.

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨2⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨16:04⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Julio Eusebio@Moztako@lemmus.org
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨FiniteBanjo@feddit.online⁩

That’s a fair point. I meant “speed up” in terms of development efficiency, rather than implying the outputs are necessarily identical. Thanks for pointing that out.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
FiniteBanjo@FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
⁨5⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Nope, clearly you didn’t get my point and we disagree about this.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Julio Eusebio@Moztako@lemmus.org
⁨5⁩d

Replying to @⁨FiniteBanjo@feddit.online⁩

I think, practically, yeah. That’s exactly the point I’m making AI is changing how we approach these problems, not simply replacing the human part.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs