posted in Technology
John Ternus Era at Apple Kicks Off With the Changing of Lake Ontario to 'Lake America'
gizmodo.com/john-ternus-era-at-apple-kicks-off-with-the-changing-of-lake-ontario-to-lake-america-2000805913
Replying to @ardi60@reddthat.com
The president has these companies hostage in terms of trade rules. They appease him or they lose out, and considering the state of big tech, they need friends, because the AI bubble has drained their supply chains of resources.
Replying to @EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
The thing is, Apple was the exception in terms of the “AI” circlejerkery. Not trying to fanboi for them - simply pointing out that they are nowhere near the proportional outlay that the kool-aid drinkers are, in terms of ML spend.
Replying to @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
That’s probably about to change with their new CEO too:
“It’s becoming clear that AI is not a fad, is not something that will go away in the next two or three years,” said Jeronimo. “It’s something that will dictate the future of most tech companies and indeed all companies.”
He reckons AI could be “the most consequential technology” for Apple because it could either help it maintain its lofty position or create a set of daunting challenges.
It’s pretty likely that AI was the reason why Apple is changing CEOs in the first place, because they have been getting criticized for not being as hopelessly stupid about it as other tech companies are.
Replying to @capital5@discuss.tchncs.de
Nah, I don’t think that’s it. Cook is 65, and retirement (or semi-retirement) is appropriate for his age.
Termus is a hardware guy, and if AI is going to play a part in Apple’s long-term plan (and I agree that it will,) it’s going to skew heavily on-device. I don’t think we see any big AI changes from Apple just because Ternus is now CEO.
Replying to @blitzen@lemmy.ca
BS is all that is driving hardware sales at the moment. Computers have been fit-for-purpose for the last 10 years.
If people don’t submit to the AI BS, they won’t need to upgrade their computers.
The only way to force people to upgrade their computers is forced obsolescence; which requires the hardware to have some sort of remote kill switch, like a TPM.
This is also why open source OSs are being criminalised; if you can run Linux on an old MacBook or Surface Pro 4, there is no incentive to buy a new computer.
Replying to @Salvo@aussie.zone
which requires the hardware to have some sort of remote kill switch, like a TPM.
Okay I’m curious now, what’s the mechanism of killing hardware via TPM?
Replying to @boonhet@sopuli.xyz
I guess @Salvo might have been referring to the possibility of subverting “trusted” platform modules into treacherous ones.