Replying to @⁨liaizon@wake.st⁩

Which does pose an interesting federation question. If the US blocks all of NoBlogs on a federal level like they say they will, and European fediverse servers are still federating just fine, what will that mean in practice? Will other fediverse hosts who have copies of all their posts then be subjected to take down notices?

Edited ⁨⁨Aug⁩ ⁨27⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨23:05⁩⁩en

Replying to @⁨liaizon@wake.st⁩

Here's an example of someone who has their NoBlogs account federated
systemli.social/@anneroth/1171

SystemliAnne Roth (@anneroth@systemli.social)Eine sehr schöne Sache an der nun von den USA als terroristisch deklarierten Blog-Plattform noblogs.org ist, dass diese Blogs direkt mit dem Fediverse verbunden werden können, durch das Plug-In ActivityPub. So könnt Ihr meinem (inzwischen sehr trägen) Blog annalist hier direkt folgen und direkt von hier aus auch dort kommentieren: @anne@annalist.noblogs.org So viel besser als die Substacks & sonstigen kommerziellen Plattformen dieser Welt.

Replying to @⁨gaditb@icosahedron.website⁩

@liaizon (Obligatory Disclaimer: This is just Posteing, and in particular I do not Actually Want either random fediverse admins nor the W3C SocialWG (nor the people involved in it) to be targetted by the US State.)

(The subtext of this Posteing is that I am interested in the possibility of ActivityPub being successful enough at enabling and supporting safe communication and coordination of social projects, that it would be seen as a similar level of threat as the email & blog hosting of A/I.)