the_riviera_kid@the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world

Replying to @⁨return2ozma@lemmy.world⁩

I like Hank, and this is a shitty article.

That aside he should be facing a revolt.

Hes supposed to be a credible source, hes an educator, hes the modern day Bill Nye. It’s very hard to take anything he says as objective truth when his research and fact checking consists of asking an LLM. Considering hallucinations and straight up lies are not only common but not even unexpected for an LLM you can’t believe anything that comes from one nor can you believe anyone who uses one.

muusemuuse@muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works

Replying to @⁨AA5B@lemmy.world⁩

no its true. ChatGPT is confidently wrong all the time, but I find its wrong in ways I can learn from anyway. I ask the question. it gets the answer wrong. But its wrong in a useful way where I actually learn more by correcting it than just getting the right answer.

I could get the same experience from talking to a person for much less money though

en
TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works

Replying to @⁨muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works⁩

They tend to work much better when you point them at things. Hallucination rates go way, way down when they aren’t pulling from their “memory.” They are, also, like you say, wrong in ways that are noticeable and often “interesting” in the Ibsen way. I also doubt that you could get the same experience for less money. I’d have to go back to college to get the education I’m getting with AI. At least community college. It’s a lot of near-experts at once. And when you point it at expert literature it basically is a senile college professor. But yeah the senile part of that statement is pretty important.