PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

Some_Emo_Chick@Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world
⁨14⁩d

Google Earth's new AI image generation function didn't survive a day after users deepfaked disasters

www.businessinsider.com/google-earth-nano-banana-gemini-ai-satellite-image-generation-function-2026-7
Business InsiderGoogle Earth's new AI image generation function didn't survive a day after users deepfaked disastersGoogle pulled its AI image-editing feature from Google Earth within 24 hours of its launch, after users created deepfakes depicting disasters.
1610472
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
FireWire400@FireWire400@lemmy.world
edited⁨14⁩d

Replying to @⁨Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world⁩

What was even the point of this; what was the intended use case?

I’m serious, I have no idea who this is for. Other than to show people that their AI can badly superimpose pictures of Godzilla over maps.

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
errer@errer@lemmy.world
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨FireWire400@lemmy.world⁩

I work in this space: you can use it to mock up commercial developments, changes in land use, etc., to see what it would look like. Somewhat useful when presenting rather dry architectural diagrams into realistic looking scenes.

Now, why it was broadly opened to the public is unclear to me other than being a flex?

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨1⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨16:06⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
FireWire400@FireWire400@lemmy.world
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨errer@lemmy.world⁩

you can use it to mock up commercial developments

Fair, but aren’t there better solutions for this already?

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
errer@errer@lemmy.world
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨FireWire400@lemmy.world⁩

Depends on how you define “better.” You can generate many variants of a scene this way, at night say, or in snowy conditions. You can mock up emergency response situations. It’s part of the story you’re telling but not a straight up replacement.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
FireWire400@FireWire400@lemmy.world
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨errer@lemmy.world⁩

I guess by better I mostly mean “without AI”

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
EnchiladaRaisins@EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨FireWire400@lemmy.world⁩

Machines should work. Humans should think.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
pemptago@pemptago@lemmy.ml
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip⁩

Seems to imply people don’t use Ai to shortcut their thinking and people don’t think when they work.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
EnchiladaRaisins@EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨pemptago@lemmy.ml⁩

The quote comes from long before this age of LLMs. We need robots (which do not spy on us) to wash our dishes and fold our laundry, freeing us to think and create.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
pemptago@pemptago@lemmy.ml
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip⁩

Generally agree, especially non-spying, but the context here is generative ai. So if I misunderstood the message, I’d be curious to know how.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Echo Dot@echodot@feddit.uk
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨errer@lemmy.world⁩

I suppose better in this case means accurate.

Unless you just need the image to be off to the side of a PowerPoint presentation and no one’s really supposed to pay any attention to it I can’t really see how I could rely on an AI to produce an output that I want.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs