PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

lemmydividebyzero@lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
⁨3⁩d

Intent to Ship: JPEG XL – Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog

hacks.mozilla.org/2026/08/intent-to-ship-jpeg-xl/
910161
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
🧨1
ikt@Eyekaytee@aussie.zone
⁨3⁩d

Replying to @⁨lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com⁩

What is the big gain over AVIF?

It’s great at lossless? but I never use lossless for web images

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
lime!@lime@feddit.nu
edited⁨3⁩d

Replying to @⁨Eyekaytee@aussie.zone⁩

the big win is that it can re-encode existing jpegs to shrink them by like 30%. also the image is compressed spatially (i think that’s the word) so it can be displayed as it’s downloading rather than coming in line by line.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
sunbeam60@sunbeam60@feddit.uk
⁨3⁩d

Replying to @⁨lime@feddit.nu⁩

But if you’re going through the trouble of re-encoding you might as well re-encode to AVIF, no?

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨5⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨19:09⁩en
2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
lime!@lime@feddit.nu
⁨3⁩d

Replying to @⁨sunbeam60@feddit.uk⁩

jxl can also extract the original jpeg bit-for-bit, meaning you can save space on disk and still serve exactly the same images as some clients expect. no rewrites.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
GamingChairModel@GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
⁨3⁩d

Replying to @⁨sunbeam60@feddit.uk⁩

Re-encoding from JPEG to AVIF will always drop quality. Lossless re-encoding from JPEG to JPEG XL makes a pixel perfect reproduction, while shrinking file size.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs