maybe i should build something like omarchy that isn't, you know, omarchy
Replying to @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
a lot of people do not understand what omarchy actually *is* and why it is making progress where traditional distributions have failed.
they focus on the fact that omarchy *is* a vanity distro, that it is basically a collection of configuration files and some shell scripts gluing them together.
and omarchy is that.
but omarchy is also marketing and devrel, and a consolidation of the linux experience into a product format.
in fact, that is most of what omarchy actually *is*.
building a technical community that understands & executes on these things would be the goal of what i propose building
Replying to @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
in essence omarchy is a mechanism to take linux and turn it into a product, in the same way that macOS takes darwin and turns it into a product.
traditional linux distributions, by comparison, aren't defined products, they are work output from technical communities, and the design of them is approached from that philosophy.
Replying to @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
somebody has already suggested that we should build this on Nix or whatever.
and like, you're just not getting the point.
the package management? flatpak.
Replying to @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
managing software needs to be obvious. package managers ain't it.
on mac, you install apps from either the app store or by dragging them to the applications folder.
Replying to @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
@ariadne I really liked something I saw once a long time ago on (I think it was) porteus. Software was all distributed in compressed packages that you could just double click to install (it got mounted into the running os so it was accessible). But that ability to just download and have it installed immediately was very nice.
