Replying to @⁨sanitation@lemmy.today⁩

Can we not legitimize these projects that will never fucking happen by reporting on them. I know the tech news places need clicks but this is not based in reality. My space tech proposal is that we all fart into jars and send the full jars to space-x for tax credits, where pure methane gas will produced. The rockets will have a pressurized 60KM long line attached to provide natural gas as a booster fuel, then detached to be caught an aircraft carrier. This will save big $$$.

Replying to @⁨AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world⁩

I don’t think you have any idea how much the power consumption is unfortunately. The roof would cover maybe 1-10% of the power consumption of a modern data center. A single rack’s power consumption is basically the same as a neighborhood. An entire data center is more like a small country.

To be clear I’m not trying to say it’s OK they’re using gas plants, I’m just saying why the solar power Musk promised was never going to be feasible.

Edit: My bad, this is a fab, I thought it was yet another XAI datacenter. Might be more feasible, but still - for energy intensive purposes, which this is likely to be, on-site solar can offset part of the energy requirement, but generally not all of it.

Replying to @⁨sanitation@lemmy.today⁩

I… wut? Even ignoring the environmental impact, that’s terrible marketing.

“Will you be using your solar panels to power this?”
“What? No. Those things wouldn’t work. I mean… they’re great. You should buy them. But they wouldn’t work for something that’s important. Well… fuck. They do work when it’s important and they are awesome and everyone else should buy them. But when it matters we count on power sources that destroy the environment, because… of reasons.”

It has to be really difficult to run a company that creates solar panels but also be a dedicated Republican who wants to poison the environment and keep that coal, oil and natural gas burning as much as possible.