Phantasm

@silverpill @technical-discussion @benpate If you are going through the trouble of using your own vocabulary, why not at least make it so that namespace conflicts don't ever happen again, similarly like they do with semantics using AS Vocab now.

If you implement OfferEndorsement and I want to use it as well, but for something incompatible with your thing. Then I guess I need to invent a new less descriptive name for my thing like: NewAPServerOfferEndorsement, if you effectively reserve that name for your thing and depend on that name being unique for handling.

So I think, something like below is a better solution to the same problem, while admittedly looking worse:

• fep-3447:OfferEndorsement
• fep-3447:AcceptEndorsement
• fep-3447:RejectEndorsement
• fep-3447:UndoEndorsement

Or

• fep-3447:Offer
• fep-3447:Accept
• fep-3447:Reject
• fep-3447:Undo

@cell That's what they say to those Belorussian refugees near Poland.

@lain @theorytoe @Cocoa @niobleoum Who knows, DeVault hasn't been part of it for like 5 years. And I have no idea what the maintainer's opinions on anything are.

When you think about it, the protocol is X11 slop but slightly different anyway. Does it matter that someone adds more slop to the already existing slop?

@niobleoum @theorytoe @Cocoa Imagine using Wayland

$ for message_id in $(notmuch search --output=messages tag:pleromagit and tag:unread and date:today); do
if [ -n "$(echo ${message_id} | grep 'pleroma/pleroma/issues/[0-9].*/close')" ]; then
if [ -n "$(notmuch show ${message_id} | grep '\*@lambadalambda\* closed')" ]; then
notmuch tag -unread ${message_id}
fi
fi
done

open email client with 300 unread messages from today lambadalambda Re: Pleroma/Pleroma Family relative looks at my screen What are those names? You are on the dark web, aren't you?

@mischievoustomato @lain Thankfully nobody will ever read my bodged together shell scripts from years ago

@lain My suspicion mostly comes from the fact that the project was almost dead and now there's a new release like every two weeks and 3 major versions with breaking changes in less than 6 months. It's either lack of care and just pushing things in a move fast, break things mentality, vibe coding, or the project is sponsored behind the scenes by someone with certain goals/features they want. Could be all three honestly.

@silverpill Since literal nobodys tried to hijack the universally recognized logo (Fedigram) and declare the three Unicode snowflakes as the "official" logo. They are still trying to do so btw. I see it as attempting rewriting history.