Replying to @⁨Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club⁩

archive.is/…/openai-is-pissing-off-a-bunch-of-mat…

TLDR:

Most of the “mathematical breakthroughs” from AI have been done by loading all available recent research from humans solving the problem, and then collating it while skipping reviews and telling the humans who did the work it would literally be “too complicated” to explain the AI didn’t actually do anything…

It’s all just lies to drive up stock prices, what they release appears to be stuff that would be released shortly anyways, it’s just being dumped at once 99% of the way done before it’s verified.

Replying to @⁨13igtyme@startrek.website⁩

I know people always say that, but there still needs to be executives so there’s still humans to be held accountable.

The vast amount of middle management are useless, but there has to be a human sitting in a chair above the chatbot for legal liability. Otherwise the board will just blame the chatbot for everything.

That also doesn’t mean they should be paid so much, just that a human needs to be above the chatbot as far as final authority

Replying to @⁨givesomefucks@lemmy.world⁩

Why though? If you needed the CEO to be held accountable, isn’t that because their role implies accountability for their actions?

If you outsource those actions to a tool, then accountability falls on whoever is using the tool. So the board, or whoever, gets the accountability. That sounds reasonable to me.

en