mojofrododojo

sure thing creep

yeah it’s just me buddy, keep telling yourself that.

m.slashdot.org/story/456972

dude, I’ve been using phones since they had dials. one place I lived, we had a party line shared with 3 neighbors.

it’s not the same thing at all. Stop acting like phones and EYEWEAR are the same. People have no reasonable expectation if you’re holding a phone to their face that they aren’t being recorded. Looking at your silly stupid mug while serving your food or walking by isn’t consenting to be recorded.

One thing I’ve really learned over the years is that a huge percentage of the population has virtually no ability to think ahead even a few years in terms of tech,

this is rich, considering how out of touch you are on this subject.

PHONES DON’T RECORD WHERE YOU LOOK.

Phones are visible! they don’t look like spectacles. Why do I have to explain this?

I suspect you’re just being duplicitous, certainly you’ve never tried to put your phone on your face or answer the glasses when you hear a ringtone.

Stop acting stupid.

Are legally blind people who use this technology to better navigate the world “perverts”?

If we limited the use case to people with genuine visual impairment that would be fine. Or even made them dayglo orange so they stand out and people can at least be aware of them.

Creeps are already building an industry on ways to defeat the warning light. Trust has been lost out of the gate. And the opportunity for AI, facial recognition and other creepy tech is just around the corner - soon you’ll have doxing, nudify and other reprehensible garbage running with these devices. watch.

creeps are going to creep, stop supplying them with better creep tools.

?

not sure what you’re saying; there’s multiple different bypasses. as long as creeps can record what they see without someone’s consent to be recorded, they’ll be creep glasses.

I want to believe you’re earnest and not some trolling chud here to promote the tech.

the ratios speak for themselves I guess.

large majority of the population will have gotten over this “only perverts wear them” thing, which is quite frankly silly anyway.

sure thing buddy.

imho the people who find these creepy af is only going to grow as awareness of them grows.

but you do you.

you do realize the light can be blocked by 1 cent worth of electrical tape? that there are tutorials online showing how to block just the light using a hole punch?

there’s always going to be ways to circumvent the light. I say restrict the devices to the visually impaired. everyone else can use a fucking camera.

You don’t care that people will find you creepy?

Like, I get it if you think you’d never do awful things, sure, but being perceived as someone in that same crowd?

Huh

Also, equating these to a phone camera, a pen camera or other device is specious as shit. ‘spy cams’ often have terrible resolution; these things do not. LOL get a minox it’s the same. derp.

also, none of your concealable cameras are RUNNING FUCKIN FACIAL RECOGNITION OR OTHER AI GARBAGE they’re certain to make for these shitspecs.

re: a standard - if it wasn’t hard technically to do so, why do you think they neglected to do it?

because the creeps who will buy these don’t want that shit.

economictimes.indiatimes.com/…/123133545.cms

eh… there are sexist assholes everywhere.

I don’t think it’s nearly as bad as reddit was. but that’s my own experience, ymmv.

do whatever you want with other consenting adults in the privacy of your home.

No one would say shit.

It’s the upskirt downshirt creepshot assholes, it’s the pick up artists and racist harrasment dickheads that should be beaten in the fucking street.

I feel bad for the people with vision impairment that these could genuinely help, but instead of making an accessibility tool, meta’s chosen to make a privacy invasion tool that has some great accessibility uses, then try to use that as cover for the creeps.

it’s all so fucking on point for the creepshow that is meta

anything is debatable, it doesn’t make it legal or ethical. creeping on people with hidden cameras is fucking gross and needs even more regulation.

but off,

there’s an entire creepy industry to disable the lights.

stealthspecs.com/…/send-in-modification-service-d…

reddit.com/…/blocking_led_light_when_recording/

www.youtube.com/watch?v=awCU4RtorMY

cybernews.com/…/meta-ai-glasses-record-without-wa…

don’t stop there, call the fucking regulatory agencies for the hospital and the doc. the hospital is obviously at enormous risk for the liability this moron is opening up and probably would like to fire him before the lawsuits land on them.

so dumb he keeps breaking the law? by breaking new laws?

what a fascinatingly stupid concept

Bullshit, voyeurism is a felony in most states. Invading someone’s privacy isn’t covered by the first fucking amendment you dolt.

so fucking sick and tired of the pervert glasses boosters.

these things belong on people with visual difficulty, the visual description service should be free to them, and the devices restricted otherwise. it’s fucking gross that so many people think ‘you have no reasonable expectation to privacy in the public’ == creep cameras are cool.

fyi, there are laws in most states against voyeurism - in my state that creep behavior is a felony.

app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

so fucking sick of the creepglass fanboys

aw poor baby got schooled and cried to the mods lol

understanding what standing on the shoulders of giants means.

bwhahahaha. Newton would spit in your face you silly toolbag, how fucking dare you.

who’s doing the inference dummy? and how much local grunt do you have? you running a gb200 with blackwell and graces huh? no you’re not, you’re a fucking casual idiot who thinks his desktop is gonna be his new best friend.

what a maroon

standing on the shoulders of giants to you means someone else stole the training sources. god you’re fucking dumb