Replying to an earlier post

If you care about avoiding LLM code, all Linux is now poisoned.

How do you figure that?

Also, Torvalds isn’t reviewing every PR sitting there like, “yes how delicious this AI generated code is! I approve!” Believe it or not, tens of thousands of people run the Linux foundation project, not just him.

And let’s keep our heads squarely on our neck here, and remember what Torvalds actually said:

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Is-Not-Anti-AI

www.phoronix.comLinus Torvalds Reaffirms That Linux Is Not "Anti-AI" & Not A "Social Warrior" ProjectOvernight Linux creator Linus Torvalds wrote another well crafted message that reaffirms the Linux kernel position of not being against AI and lashing back against some kernel developers that are against AI/LLM usage within the kernel project.

Replying to an earlier post

That just explains Torval’s attitude, which I just explained to you first (by the way) but it doesn’t explain your statement that “all of Linux is now poisoned“.

That’s gonna require a substantial amount more proof than a philosophical position taken by Linus Torvalds

(to be clear: I’m pretty anti AI myself, and I don’t agree with Torvalds position, and I’m definitely not arguing in Support of it)

Replying to @⁨eurodyne@piefed.world⁩

That’s gonna require a substantial amount more proof than a philosophical position taken by Linus Torvalds

“Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug” <-- literally spelled out in the headline.

1600 commits contain the word “claude” alone: github.com/search?q=repo%3Atorvalds%2Flinux+claud…

It’s so easy to find out, yet you insist that you are right. Hilarious.