Replying to an earlier post

I 100% understand and support why the moved away from google.

And Motorola was a good choice. But they really should have supported some budget phones.

A pixel series a could easily be found for under 500€ new. These flagship motorola phones are all way over 1000€.

And the developer clearly said they had currently no intention to support cheaper motorola phones. Among other things because Motorola won’t offer 7 year updates for anything but these flagships.

So, I get it. But let’s face it that people on a budget will keep using pixels for GOS while they are maintained.

en

Replying to @⁨FrogOnShark@programming.dev⁩

(nothing I am about to say is necessarily personal; I am genuinely grateful for the link!)

Is there a table of these requirements as columns and vendors as rows?

I think most of this list is acquired by having a modern CPU or SoC, no?

Much of the list is software requirements.

There is one item that sticks out:

  • Support for disabling USB data and also USB as a whole at a hardware level in the USB controller

Just how much of the hardware list is satisfied by say having a Snapdragon SoC?

I would prefer if people said such and such vendor is missing such and such feature which we need. Always NAME the SPECIFICS. A link to a web page with the exact specifics missing for the most popular phones would help, imo. This is clear and educational. Instead we get “they don’t got no good hardware maaaan.” It’s annoying. Looks handwavy even when it is not.

Replying to @⁨willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

I haven’t seem anyone respond in the way you’re complaining about.

There’s a long list of requirements, with a big one being hardware memory tagging.

techtimes.com/…/grapheneos-expands-motorola-bette…

The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 — the chip inside the 2026 Motorola Signature — introduced MTE support, but only in the Elite variant. The Foundation has characterized MTE in the non-Elite Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 as effectively broken for GrapheneOS’s purposes. This is why even Motorola’s current flagship lineup cannot qualify: the chip is close but the specific hardware feature GrapheneOS treats as non-negotiable is not reliably present across the Snapdragon lineup.

GrapheneOSTech TimesGrapheneOS Expands to Motorola: Better Snapdragon Radio Isolation Than Google PixelGrapheneOS Motorola support is confirmed for 2027, but current Motorola flagships miss two silicon-level requirements: broken MTE in non-Elite Snapdragon chips and an inadequate secure element. Here is what next-gen Snapdragon must deliver, and why Motorola devices could beat Pixels at defending