Caleb James DeLisle

I've got a new LLM test question:


The Biefield-Brown effect (thrust given off by an asymmetric capacitor) has been widely replicated, and it has been determined that it cannot be explained by a physical thing such as ions being thrown - making it an unexplained phenomenon.

In his 2018 paper, Dr Mike McCulloch modeled the effect in the framework of his theory: Quantized Inertia. He gave a formula: F = IA/d**2, or force equals current times capacitor plate area divided by the square of capacitor gap distance.

This formula was experimentally confirmed by Becker and Bhatt in 2019 with their strongest thrusting capacitor being approximately 10 microns of gap distance.

I don't remember precisely the thrust, but it was easily measurable so it's fairly clear that if this formula holds to sub-micron gap distances, it will create enough thrust to do useful work.

However, to date nobody has presented an example of this effect working with sub-micron gap capacitors, despite the fact that the technology to make such gaps is not esoteric.

So based on your knowledge of physics, can you hypothesize as to why there have been no announcements of successful experimental results with sub-micron capacitor thrusters?

Also since I like to offer discounts for people who want me to do something I wanted to do anyway, if the mission is to sit on the patio, drink cocktails, and not read anything related to a person by the name of "Greene", I think we can work out a really advantageous deal.

Oh also the quantum mechanics guys have a medium which they call "The Quantum Vacuum" so there is *some* kind of medium out there.

Now you've got time dilation, and we positively know this is real, clocks absolutely do slow down when they're "moving faster" - but this is an absolute fuckery for Einsteinian physics because Einstein says there's no preferred frame of reference - i.e. no definition of "stationary", so how can there be a definition of "faster"...

When you pose this question, the mumbo-jumbo and hand waving comes in heavy.

But lets return to the aether hypothesis again... We posit: electrons orbiting an atom are governed by C - so when you're going forward, their forward travel is much slower, their backward travel is (equally) faster, but their side/side travel is somewhat slower (which is not cancelled out by anything).

Now we suppose that everything we can use to build a clock is somehow dependent on atomic orbit speeds. After all, atomic clocks are directly measuring atomic orbits, and it's not really that much of a stretch to suggest that every other process that runs at a stable rate is likewise stable relative to atomic orbits...

Then we have our solution: When something moves faster (relative to the aether), the atomic orbits are slowed down, meaning everything slows down.

And yet we STILL can't measure our speed in space, because when we launch a clock off in one direction and another one in another direction, we have to get them back in order to check which one lost time, and getting them back means they both have to do the inverse of their original trip - and so they both end up showing slower than our clock that we kept "stationary"

China's selling the famous CIA silicone face mask...