Skip to main content
PPlamenu
HomeLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

return2ozma@return2ozma@lemmy.world
⁨25⁩d

FAA tees up $875M AI tool to help manage air traffic congestion

arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/faa-tees-up-875m-ai-tool-to-help-manage-air-traffic-congestion/
2610216
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
tquid@tquid@sh.itjust.works
⁨25⁩d

Replying to @⁨return2ozma@lemmy.world⁩

That should go swimmingly

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
ReptilianCleric@ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip
⁨25⁩d

Replying to @⁨tquid@sh.itjust.works⁩

Well, honestly, this might be one of the use cases where these “AI” tools could be useful. Pattern recognition is something they are actually great at accomplishing. That said, I am still skeptical and concerned that the algorithms are being designed and deployed mindfully.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
acosmichippo@acosmichippo@lemmy.world
edited⁨25⁩d

Replying to @⁨ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip⁩

we can’t even get self driving cars right yet, I’m not sure ATC is going to be any better (certainly not on whatever pittance the government will fund it). 99% reliability will probably be easy, it’s that last 1% that could take decades to fix.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Shadow@Shadow@lemmy.ca
edited⁨25⁩d

Replying to @⁨acosmichippo@lemmy.world⁩

We’ve had self flying and landing planes for years though. You can’t really compare controlled airspace to the chaos that is operating on the ground.

I’m still skeptical they won’t fuck it up, but this should be a manageable problem for ai.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
bthest@bold_atlas@lemmy.world
⁨25⁩d

Replying to @⁨Shadow@lemmy.ca⁩

Yet pilots still fly and land manually. And if those systems work so well why haven’t we had self-controlling air traffic for years too?

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨21⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨07:19⁩Edited ⁨⁨Sep⁩ ⁨21⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨07:23⁩⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs