Flock CEO Garrett Langley targeted as address shared online

He should just point a flock camera at his house. Then he’ll be 80% safer based on a study I just made up like the ones on their sales pitch.

Even better, a group should cut down several dozen of them and mount them all on poles outside his house during the night, so that he wakes up to them in the morning. No vandalism, no violence, no threats, just a blunt statement that the media couldn’t possibly ignore.

Heck, no need to even risk collecting that many real ones. I hear there’s some fairly decent 3D printed fakes available.

a group should cut down several dozen of them

No vandalism

😐

E: LOL downvotes for facts, I guess

Technically not theft. Technically not vandalism.

“Vandalism refers to the intentional destruction or defacement of property”

They relocated the item to its owners house. At best the cutting might be vandalism but you don’t have to cut them down. That just happens to be quicker.

It is 100% vandalism, in every sense. I support it, but there’s no rationalizing it as anything else.

Nice downvote.

You didn’t look up the legal definition of anything before you posted this nonsense. Have a good day.

Nonsense? You just posted a definition that describes this activity exactly…?

No. I did not. Relocation of the asset to the owners property means there’s no intent to deprive the owner of said property which means that it’s not theft.

The property has not been defaced, damaged, or destroyed so that means there’s no intent of vandalism. Therefore vandalism did not take place.

What you’re describing is criminal mischief, which I would agree this is.

I made a singular allowance in the case that the pole was cut (which counts as damage), rather than being dug up (which wouldn’t), which you appear to have ignored.

If you don’t like facts, that is a you problem.

You are welcome to kagi or whatever this yourself to see what I’m talking about instead of doubling down.

If you are incapable of that, don’t bother to respond to me.