Ariadne Conill 🐰:therian:

View original page

@ariadne@social.treehouse.systems · Joined ⁨Apr⁩ ⁨2022⁩

sometimes a bunny, sometimes a witch, sometimes an operating system designer

Pronouns
she/her or they/them

Replying to @⁨ariadne@social.treehouse.systems⁩

anyway, the reason why i am not moved by the moral argument around copyright and GenAI is very simple: generally, the GenAI companies have infinity times more money than the artists they are ripping off.

which means making a copyright claim against a GenAI company is both expensive and unlikely to succeed unless you can afford the same lawyers they have

welcome to the US legal system: whoever has the most money tends to win civil litigation

fwiw the copyright arguments about GenAI do not hold water with me. copyright is the tool of the noble classes, and should be abolished. the fix is, and has always been, to abolish copyright.

what arguments *do* hold water with me are the political ones: commercial GenAI represents the greatest concentration of money & political power our generation has ever seen.

my arguments *against* GenAI in alpine, and in my own projects, are based on a risk analysis of that concentration of power: as maintainers we cannot protect our autonomy, nor our projects' sovereignty, in an era where we become dependent on GenAI. the people who control our access to GenAI technology will, instead, be the person who exercises total control over FOSS projects which embrace GenAI.