You’re still liable as the owner of the gun. You can sue the builder of the gun in turn of course so they go to jail too.

WanderingThoughts
Replying to @Jobe@feddit.org
Use and/or for clarity. They’re probably both incompetent and malicious.
Replying to @athatet@lemmy.zip
To illustrate it’s only good in stupid stuff like that and not so good for real work.
Replying to @FireWire400@lemmy.world
That’s the whole story from the beginning. It’s not good and trustworthy enough for the real work but they’ve poured all that money in there so it needs to be used.
Replying to @return2ozma@lemmy.world
Maybe they can use AI to fix it
Replying to @Kaligalis@lemmy.world
Europa is having the discussion. You see one camp that wants to shut down exporting of waste and demand full recycling and local production. And the other group that’s basically complaining it’s more expensive again ignoring long term consequences.
Replying to @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
With explicit technology sharing contracts. The name was a hint.
Replying to @stumu415@lemmy.zip
It’s ridiculous to do that so late in the game, but companies really wanted to outsource production to cheap areas in the 80s and ignore the long term consequences.
Replying to @cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca
If it automatically blurs out the face and body of everybody unless they explicitly gave permission to be recorded by that user through an app or site, and on a base level before the feed goes to any app, then you can have some semblance of privacy.
Replying to @HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
… which hasn’t learned yet they’ll not get any promotion or credit for good ideas and most likely will only receive more work and pressure
FTFY
Replying to @BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
Untill you want to protect consumers from something capitalists are doing. Then it’s all about not limiting innovation. In reality , innovation translates into additional fees, subscriptions, dynamic pricing and that kind of stuff.
Replying to @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
They have the Boring company too. They can dig much deeper.
Replying to @panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
They had to choose between short term profits and being relevant by 2030. Shareholders picked the first option.
Replying to @Talaraine@fedia.io
They went to some fancy private school and haven’t had contact with someone earning less than 6 digits until their thirties.
