PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today
⁨2⁩d

AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?

www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/13/ai-agents-arent-legally-responsible-for-any-harm-that-they-cause-experts-say-so-who-is
3310376
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
fubarx@fubarx@lemmy.world
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

You rolled a bowling ball down a hill. It struck a few cars on the way and went through a house and killed their pet. Guess who would be held responsible? You or the bowling ball manufacturer?

What if the bowling ball was really shiny and worth $100B? Should it make a difference?

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
GreenBeard@GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

If I make a gun that actively chooses to kill people, I didn’t build a gun and that whole argument falls apart. I’d hold everyone from the CEO to the janitor accountable.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
WanderingThoughts@WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

You’re still liable as the owner of the gun. You can sue the builder of the gun in turn of course so they go to jail too.

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨13⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨10:08⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs