PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

themachinestops@themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨7⁩d

Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice

lists.debian.org/debian-project/…/msg00041.html

www.xda-developers.com/linus-used-ai-bug-llm-critics-face-choice/
5210418
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
shirasho@shirasho@feddit.online
⁨7⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

LLMs suck at writing code, but they are absolutely amazing at reading code and finding bugs. I am firmly against the usage of LLMs to write anything, but they have a place as a diagnostics tool when verified by a human.

8000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
rothaine@rothaine@lemmy.zip
⁨7⁩d

Replying to @⁨shirasho@feddit.online⁩

Opus-class and higher models are actually great at writing code, but maybe it’s language dependent? I primarily work in TypeScript.

4000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
CancerMancer@CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
⁨7⁩d

Replying to @⁨rothaine@lemmy.zip⁩

I’m not terribly concerned if people write code and test it with AI, so long as they verify the results themselves.

I recently saw someone try to add a PR to something on github with thousands of lines of changes and then they got mad when people didn’t want to do the free labour verifying it. That is a bullshit use of AI

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
MangoCats@MangoCats@feddit.it
⁨6⁩d

Replying to @⁨CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works⁩

AI or far-east coders, we encourage them to keep their PRs as small as possible.

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨1⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨19:58⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs