Skip to main content
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

eicker@eicker@lemmy.world
edited⁨13⁩d

Trump Launched an America.[gov] “Super Intelligence” Chatbot and It Immediately Disagrees With Him on Huge Topics, Including Whether He Won the 2020 Election.

futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/trump-ai-disagrees-election
3210788
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
EatMyPixelDust@EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨eicker@lemmy.world⁩

This is why I’ll never believe the claim that AI will save humanity. It may well give the answers to “save us” but we already know the answer. We just don’t care. We’re not going to listen to AI if we don’t listen to ourselves.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
NotAnOtter@NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone⁩

It’s a language calculator. It has no intrinsic incentive to tell the truth, it just processes words.

There is no reason to trust AI’s reasoning on what could “save us” even if it offered one.

4000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Lovable Sidekick@LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
⁨13⁩d

Replying to @⁨NotAnOtter@lemmus.org⁩

Right, its answer would be a distillation of what humans have written on the topic of how to save us.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
tetris11@tetris11@feddit.uk
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨LovableSidekick@lemmy.world⁩

what humans have written

a highly curated selection that panders to the views of the AI’s sponsors

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Lovable Sidekick@LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨tetris11@feddit.uk⁩

Panders to the pro-Trump views of tech billionaires? Strangely counterintuitive.

⁨Oct⁩ ⁨3⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨21:47⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs