PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

themachinestops@themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨7⁩d

Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice

lists.debian.org/debian-project/…/msg00041.html

www.xda-developers.com/linus-used-ai-bug-llm-critics-face-choice/
5210418
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@flamingos@feddit.uk
⁨7⁩d

Replying to @⁨themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

AI code bans may be impossible to enforce in the first place

I hate this attitude that if a rule or standard can’t be enforced perfectly, we shouldn’t strive for it. We can’t (reasonably) run an OS free of proprietary software, does that mean the free software movement should just give up?

10000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
woelkchen@woelkchen@lemmy.world
⁨7⁩d

Replying to @⁨flamingos@feddit.uk⁩

I think one way is to make people realize that there is a concept in copyright called Threshold of Originality, meaning that because machine generated output in itself is not creative work, it’s not copyrightable. You can do literally anything with it, the licenses attached don’t matter. The GPL is not enforceable and no proprietary EULA is enforceable.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
FiniteBanjo@FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
⁨6⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Conversely it might already be copywritten because the originality of the output work belongs to the author of the training data.

⁨Sep⁩ ⁨2⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨15:58⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs