PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

HaraldvonBlauzahn@HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
edited⁨1⁩d

The Rust programming language project is adopting an LLM policy

blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/08/05/rust-langrust-is-adopting-an-llm-policy/
21076
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
emb@emb@lemmy.world
edited⁨1⁩d

Replying to @⁨HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org⁩

From the article:

The policy summarizes itself this way:

It’s fine to use LLMs to answer questions, analyze, distill, refine, check, suggest, review. But not to create.

Uses in the first category are allowed, sometimes requiring disclosure. Uses in the second category are heavily restricted.

Seems pretty level-headed to me.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
crandlecan@crandlecan@mander.xyz
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

nah, it’s a dumb policy which will be impossible to maintain in the years to come.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
dindonmasker@Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Maybe in the years to come but the shit code flood gates are open now when the tech isn’t good enough for the job.

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨14⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨14:45⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs