posted in Technology
'Big Short' Investor Expects AI Bubble Burst 'Sooner Than Later'
gizmodo.com/big-short-investor-expects-ai-bubble-burst-sooner-than-later-2000818889
Replying to @return2ozma@lemmy.world
I own a beer bar, and we work with some friends who have a catering business that does pop ups on our patio. They’ve been using AI to generate flyers and then tag us to have us share them to our larger audience. I stopped doing it because they look like trash, get low engagement, and are off brand for our art-inspired space. They got upset with me that we weren’t helping promote, and I explained my position on their AI flyers, and they sent a very lengthy email back about how AI is being utilized by small businesses in ways that we’re still scratching the surface to understand its value. I popped the email into chatgpt and asked if it wrote that email and it said it did, lol. Now I have more work on my hands to design their flyers for them, but it’s worth it.
Replying to @Kcap@lemmy.world
I popped the email into chatgpt and asked if it wrote that email and it said it did, lol
It doesn’t work that way tho
Replying to @drmoose@lemmy.world
I mean, it literally does though. The email sounded phony AF, especially knowing that the person’s first language isn’t English and it was overly proper sounding. I copy and pasted it into chatgpt and said “did you write this email?“ and it’s response was” yes, based on the writing style and phrasing, I wrote this content."
Replying to @Kcap@lemmy.world
Someone put in the intro to the book Frankenstein into an ai checker and it confirmed it to be 100 percent written by an LLM. It’s not deterministic.
Replying to @Reality@feddit.org
It’s not deterministic.
This is the first thing about LLMs always, and what most people can’t seem to understand.
LLMs are a thing where you give an input and get an output, and it happens to correspond to reality much of the time. But there’s no actual understanding there.
Replying to @mattyroses@lemmy.today
Exactly why it needs code to enforce repetitive results.
Replying to @Kcap@lemmy.world
I’ve been using ChatGPT a bit at work lately, since they’ve already paid for the subscription for everyone. I’ve learned that it is a bad idea to ask it any leading question, because it is likely to just give you the answer you want to hear.
Replying to @Kcap@lemmy.world
Doesn’t work that way. Only if they programmed LLMs to sign the work like using a hash you would be able to confirm or deny with 100% accuracy
It does not remember things it made, so no. It doesn’t work that way.
Replying to @ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
It doesn’t remember but that won’t keep it from answering a question as to whether it thinks an email was AI generated. It’ll also be happy to confidently answer a question with a wrong answer to.