posted in Technology
Dutch retailer pulls Meta glasses as hundreds of women reportedly filmed
cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/52666693
cybernews.com/ai-news/meta-glasses-pulled-hans-anders/Another win for privacy <3
posted in Technology
Dutch retailer pulls Meta glasses as hundreds of women reportedly filmed
cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/52666693
cybernews.com/ai-news/meta-glasses-pulled-hans-anders/Another win for privacy <3
Replying to @madeindex@lemmy.world
Wait, what? I did not expect The Netherlands to sell these piece of shit stuff. I had hoped, it would be banned/ prohibited in The Netherlands. It should be.
Replying to @ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Parliament has expressed the desire for a clearer ban on these glasses a few weeks ago
nos.nl/…/2632327-tweede-kamer-wil-breder-en-duide…
Parliament wants wider and clearer ban on camera glasses
We already have privacy legislation, and it is already not allowed to secretly film someone and share the footage. So parliament is mostly talking about making it more explicit that these camera glasses are not allowed.
They are currently awaiting an advisory on “AI wearables” by the European Committee for Data Protection, which will arrive later this autumn.
nos.nlTweede Kamer wil breder en duidelijker verbod op camerabrilEr gelden al rechtsregels voor het gebruik van de 'gluurbril' en de beeldopnamen. Toch worden veel mensen slachtoffer.Replying to @Humanius@lemmy.world
it is already not allowed to secretly film someone and share the footage.
But it’s perfectly OK to do as long as you’re the only one watching it afterwards!?
Replying to @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
That’s how most of the world works with regards to filming in public.
Replying to @ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Last time I went to The Hague, I saw a dedicated rayban/meta store in the city centre