posted in Technology
Apple Ordered to Pay $5.7 Billion for Infringing Haptics Patent in iPhone, Apple Watch
www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/apple-5-billion-dollars-haptics-patent-iphone-apple-watch/posted in Technology
Apple Ordered to Pay $5.7 Billion for Infringing Haptics Patent in iPhone, Apple Watch
www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/apple-5-billion-dollars-haptics-patent-iphone-apple-watch/Replying to @TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
Its always nice to find good news in my feed
Replying to @Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world
How is this good news? Haptic feedback has existed since the 1970s. This patent should be invalid.
Replying to @reddig33@lemmy.world
The patent is not on haptic feedback. The patent is on a very specific means of implementing haptic feedback using ferrofluids and electromagnetic actuators that it is claimed (and Apple deemed it good enough to copy, so presumably truly) allows for both a smaller implementation than typical mechanical haptic feedback (i.e. the off-balance-flywheel approach of phones of old), while also allowing for low- or zero- noise compared to “speaker or piezo” based haptic feedback.
There are a lot of shit patents in the world, but on a surface reading at least this seems sufficiently novel that I don’t see why it should be invalid. One also presumes that if Apple had any grounds to invalidate it on prior-art they would have done so.
Replying to @timochka@lemmy.zip
So I looked into this and you are right and I am wrong. Deleting my previous posts since there’s more to this case than just haptics.
Replying to @reddig33@lemmy.world
Well, all credit to you!
Sometimes Lemmy can be surprising in a good way :^).