Replying to @⁨return2ozma@lemmy.world⁩

It is part of the grift. Anthropic and OpenAI want to go public and a huge part of their cash burn is compute expense for training new models. (In public filings they claim they are profitable … if you look at their numbers that’s only if you remove their biggest expense which is model training) At the same time they are seeing fewer gains with new frontier models. Some are also claiming the new models aren’t as good as the ones from a year ago and you are loosing your market advantage with frontier models?

What do you do if your largest expense is generating fewer gains and you want to go public? Get the government to regulate it and build a regulatory mote around your industry and freeze your advantage over your competitors while you have it. Cut that expense and go public as a profitable company!

At this point I only want to see regulations well after the AI bubble pops. Don’t take any government stakes in these AI companies as Bernie has argued for (I agree with his stances on most economic matters but he’s off base with this). Let these AI companies burn in the free market they advocate for soo much.

Replying to @⁨tmyakal@infosec.pub⁩

America had to build the (atom) bomb to “beat the Russians to it”. Then the h-bomb, then the ICBM. Every time it was “we, the good guys need this first to save the world”.

Except, even ignoring the “good guys” part, its always easier to copy and steal than build something new from scratch. In every case, America just ended up handing the tech to Russia. You dont slow down tech by inventing it first.

Replying to @⁨FireWire400@lemmy.world⁩

I heard an interview recently with Emile Torres about this. And he didn’t make this any less stupid, but he did a great job helping to explain the deranged pathologies of the people behind these.

When you have the power to make decisions at a global scale, your goals and fears are radically different from those of people who only have the ability to make choices that impact their household or family or neighborhood.

These people have a fantasy of being not just A “great man of history” but THE greatest, most important, most monumental figure to have ever lived in the whole universe. And in their head, if this technology either allows humans to make a superior species that replaces us and goes on to conquer the whole galaxy or just eradicates all the life on the only habitable planet we know of… well what a legacy, you know? There’s no bigger tombstone that says ‘I MATTERED!’

And that’s what they crave. They’re basically sick, poisoned with toxic levels of power and ego.

Replying to @⁨SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social⁩

There is a train race. Just like car racers, you have train racers putting coal in the engine, pushing the machine forward the finish line.

At one point, a few racers are saying that they are moving at incredible speed and everything is “so hot”.

As any train, you own the speed, not the track! At one point, a racer might say that the current speed is too fast if a sharp curve is coming, but that he cannot stop putting coal in the engine because slowing down might cost him the race…

That’s what is happening.

N.B. I don’t agree with AI LLM and all that, I am trying to explain as best as I could.

See the Skeleton sport too…

Replying to @⁨return2ozma@lemmy.world⁩

Investors are so brave! It’s a risk they’re willing to take.

Quick reminder: this is all possible because conservatives make it impossible to stop. Conservatives are the foot-soldiers of the billionaires. If not for conservatives, the normal people would be able to charge billionaires with crimes and make them pay taxes.

Conservatives existing is the ONLY thing protecting billionaires. There is no way to defeat the boss until his foot-soldiers are dead.

Replying to @⁨Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today⁩

You have to account for the ratchet/motte-and-bailey tactics of the “other side” to co-opt energy mobilized against Conservatives into… Serving corporate efforts, wars, and basically just acting to the maximum amount of conservators while preserving the image of opposition.

Conservatives don’t get in power because the opposition is doing a really good job opposing.

So the problem is opportunistic parasitism build from a culture and social structure that rewards consolidating your wealth, and suggests the ‘good people’ use their power to stopper the leaks of basic social functioning at every other level.

So, good people don’t have the power to compete in such a system, and bad people consolidate, and opportunistically cooperate much better than most cooperative progressives seem to.

None of this would be possible without the idiot cult suckling fascist propaganda, but it’s definitely a more robust problem than that.