posted in Technology
Some lawmakers doubt a Congress that’s ‘barely capable of email’ can regulate AI
www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/lawmakers-doubt-congress-s-barely-capable-email-can-regulate-ai-rcna599824posted in Technology
Some lawmakers doubt a Congress that’s ‘barely capable of email’ can regulate AI
www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/lawmakers-doubt-congress-s-barely-capable-email-can-regulate-ai-rcna599824Replying to @return2ozma@lemmy.world
When you treat is as a tool, like guns, then it’s simple: AI does not do unlawful things, people do. So anyone handling this tool is responsible for ‘it’s’ actions.
Treat AI as if it’s an intelligent pet, and any damages it does also transfers to the one responsible for it - almost the same difference. When a certain line of AI’s keep doing unlawful things then, because it’s categorized as ‘pet’, treat them as an unreliable breed.
Treat AI as an stand-alone individual, then ask why on Earth a company let’s an untrained idiot have access to all kinds of sensitive PII data and continuously allow it to hack websites.
Replying to @Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
Lol, I like to dream too.
We can’t even get laws stating that these fucking machanical turk “AI” cab companies are responsible for the shit their driverless cars do, and those have immediate real world impacts.
Replying to @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
If you ask me then each and every single “driverless” car should have its own driver’s exam. And should be renewed after every lobotomy or “upgrade”.
Replying to @Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
I have a better question: at least some of those “driverless” cars are at least some of the time remote controlled by people in Southeast Asia or Pacifica. Do they have valid US driving licenses?