Replying to a post on lemmy.ca
Honestly asking, why even bring this up? What does this have to do with the topic of the post?
All you do is start an argument and divert away from the topic that was supposed to be discussed.
Replying to @CosmicCleric@lemmy.world
Just spiteful. And ironic if you really want to claim to care about public health
Replying to @wantd2B1ofthestrokes@discuss.tchncs.de
Science isn’t a religion. It’s a process. Just because it’s called a vaccine doesn’t mean its safe. You can be anti-this-particular-vaccine without being anti-all-vaccines.
(Edit - I misremembered what was hinky. For posterity, I’m restructuring my comment and preserving the bad take struck out below.)
In the case of the covid vaccines, that process was intentionally minimized as to bring the vaccine to market faster.
The vaccine did have benefits. It also had complications
that instead of being found out in trials were found out after release.
Replying to @ilex@lemmy.world
By refusing COViD vaccine despite all evidence showing it safe and effective, you put others in danger. I agree on being spiteful: you endanger me and my family because you don’t trust science , then you don’t deserve the personal benefit of science treating your auto-immune disease
Replying to @AA5B@lemmy.world
I didn’t refuse the vaccine. Get the fuck out of here.
E: And all evidence didn’t show it was safe. There were risks. In the case of the vaccine itself, iirc, the risks of serious side effect were less than the risk of serious complication from covid. The primary 2-stage vaccine is a good call.
I did refuse a particular booster because the available data on it showed for my demographic the risks outweighed the potential gains; it was more likely to harm me than help me.
Replying to @ilex@lemmy.world
[deleted]