Replying to @⁨Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works⁩

Firefox is funded by Google anyway.

That sounds like Firefox only exists because Google/Alphabet pays for it.

In reality Firefox/Mozilla have made a deal to make Google the default search engine on the default home page.

That would be a pretty stupid business decision to not have free money, what are they gonna do? Have Bing as the default search engine?

Replying to @⁨tidderuuf@lemmy.world⁩

Firefox does only exist because Google pays for it. Google is Mozilla’s single greatest financial contributor. They’re essentially keeping a competitor on life support to avoid breaching antitrust laws. Essentially, the argument is that as long as Firefox exists, Google isn’t a monopoly.

However, at any time, Google could simply stop paying, and Firefox would quickly die. Laws change.

Replying to an earlier post

Been using zen browser for quite some time. I use a session saver add-on and that one works weirdly due to how Zen has spaces and how that works. The way I understand zen’s spaces is like they are browser sessions that can be run simultaneously. Each of them have their own pinned tabs for example, can have default containers they open in, on top of the universal whole browser pinned tabs they call essentials tabs; that’s limited to 12 for now.

Sideberry and tree style tabs might not work as you expect because of the changes the zen team made

Replying to an earlier post

Zen devs were incredibly bad about messing with my workflows that I had setup for Zen. So much so that I eventually just stopped updating the app and moved back to Firefox to let them get their goals together.

I use Zen for small things like research and whatnot, but Firefox will always be the only browser I use for serious stuff like banking and bills.

Zen is better these days, but the fact I can’t get rid of the spaces crap really irks me. I don’t need it, and don’t want it, but it is a “core part” of their ethos so I am stuck with it. I just renamed it to … and stopped worrying about it as much. Still recommend giving it a shot for smaller stuff, but definitely not banking and the like.

Replying to an earlier post

I stick with zen because of spaces. I have a few, e.g. common browsing, work or serious topics, finances, shopping. Each of them I assigned default containers that they will run. And each if them have different pinned tabs related to the spaces.

It’s been so long since I switched that I honestly forgot how Firefox base is. I think before I switched I used sideberry to do all that spaces thing but zen is more integrated feeling.

There’s just something that hits it for me that it’s indispensable for me.

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

I am not in the AI==bad camp because I believe in nuance. I see a lot of people shit on Firefox for integrating LLM-related features. What the blog post points out and people fail to recognize is that if Mozilla stopped maintaining Firefox, almost all of its forks would die. People make similar arguments about Canonical and Ubuntu. Would these people pay Mozilla or Canonical for their work? The corporate investors do. I’m not saying I agree with it all, but that’s how it works.

Replying to @⁨vhstape@lemmy.ml⁩

if Mozilla stopped maintaining Firefox, almost all of its forks would die.

That’s an assumption. You’re severely underestimating the amount of work open source maintainers put into those things.

Would these people pay […] Canonical for their work?

Plenty of nice distribs exist without being maintained by a corporation. Good on them, for getting to have a bunch of money of the opensource, but it’s not a necessary model for the opensource projects to survive.

I see a lot of people shit on Firefox for integrating LLM-related features

And that’s good, as it should be. They crammed this bullshit that nobody asked for, and reluctantly gave a button to opt out a year later, and it’s still on by default. This is bad behavior regardless of your stance on it.

Replying to @⁨Nalivai@lemmy.world⁩

You’re severely underestimating the amount of work open source maintainers put into those things.

Which Firefox fork is a hard fork? Which Firefox fork has a hard fork of the Gecko engine?

As far as I know, all Firefox forks are dependent on the Gecko engine, and basically have Firefox as upstream.

I would love for you to prove me wrong, but I don’t believe any of these projects, though with many highly dedicated contributors, would be able to maintain active development of a web browser engine that can keep up with new modern web standards.

There is a reason the Ladybird project is taking so long to materialize and has many sponsors giving significant amounts of money.

Internet shit is hard. Firefox and their forks only work because Mozilla is fucking huge and has money to develop Firefox as part of the three big industry standard web browsers. Even though Mozilla does a lot of stupid decisions and spends the majority of their money on dumb shit, and they put dumb shit into the default Firefox that they ship, it is still excellent in many ways and the very best thing we have as a FOSS web browser. I encourage everyone to use Firefox with hardening or one its forks.

I agree with the article, and people saying “Yeah let’s boycott Firefox, use [insert Firefox fork here]” every time there is a Lemmy post on a stupid decision by Mozilla are effectively not boycotting Firefox at all, or if they recommend a Chromium fork they are supporting Chrome/Google, even if they don’t think they are. These forks are in essence just preconfigured and hardened Firefox/Chromium profiles with a few bells and whistles here and there.

ladybird.orgLadybirdLadybird is a truly independent web browser, backed by a non-profit.

Replying to @⁨berber@feddit.org⁩

Why would anyone waste enormous amount of energy making a new engine, when forked Gecko works and you can backport Mozilla’s updates to it. Same way with Linux, everyone uses Linux kernel because it exists.
When/if those project die, that’s when you’ll start seeing replacements, and at some point the best or most popular will be seen as mainstream and will be a focus point of all the enthusiasts. Like Firefox now.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that a corporation is required to have a good opensource project, just because right now a corporation maintains this specific one.

These forks are in essence just preconfigured and hardened Firefox

That’s also not true for a lot of the projects. Forks maintain their own code, porting new updates from Mozilla’s stuff, but they aren’t required to port everything, and that’s the big reason to use them.

Replying to @⁨vhstape@lemmy.ml⁩

I see a lot of people shit on Firefox for integrating LLM-related features. What the blog post points out and people fail to recognize is that if Mozilla stopped maintaining Firefox, almost all of its forks would die.

You’re misreading why people are shitting on FF. It would have been nice if Firefox had actually worked on literally any other features in the last decade, like not trashing support for PWAs. Instead, we got nothing but stupid partnerships with companies for features not one wanted, and a succession of failures in the CEO seat of Firefox.

So, yeah, I guess I don’t think it"s realistic for Firefox to have ignored the LLM craze entirely, but man, they could have managed that Google money better.

Replying to an earlier post

They alienate people who can’t cope with change - but change is needed if Firefox doesn’t want to disappear into irrelevance. They need to have as many communication channels open as they can, and they need to implement features that might pull in new users. They actually go out of their way to make sure new features are optional, so that legacy users can keep their experience, but even implementing the possibility of using LLMs in the browser (which is pretty much a standard thing in browsers nowadays) made these FOSS users screech like harpies - it’s not like implementing a side view window (they already had those) that integraties a few API calls was a huge investment in manpower or resources. This behavior extends to the vast majority of FF forks.

I was using Librewolf, Zen Browser and Waterfox (on Android) before. Their immature screeching made me switch back to Firefox after many years. Privacy-wise i am pretty sure the loss of Librewolf’s features are more than compensated by being part of a much larger group of people with my browser / extensions choice.

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

Firefox is our last best hope for browser engine diversity

Browser engine diversity died a decade ago. As soon as Google helped extend the standards, making browser engines the overengineered mess of today,xyou can barely get past basic html and js without a multi-million-dollar company/orgnization.

We need to start anew. You can do simpler with the same capabilities, if you drop the right “features”.

Replying to an earlier post

I just use Floorp with my linux and windows installs. on OpenBSD my options are a bit more limited so I need to either try to compile Floorp for it or find something else (if there even is anything else)

Hell Floorp is even on Haiku. It’s a rock solid firefox fork made by a Japanese dev team that doesn’t release/update until things are absolutely rock solid. I can’t even recall the last time floorp broke, if it ever has. good browser, always my go to FF fork.

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

The author mentioned someone switching from Firefox to Vivaldi because Firefox got on twitter, while Vivaldi is already on twitter. I see people make these same kind of brain-dead attacks on Firefox all the time, I don’t get it. They just really want to hate Firefox for some reason. Like I heard someone say once that they switched to Chrome because they didn’t like Firefox pushing AI. Are you kidding me?!