posted in Technology
As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated code
www.xda-developers.com/as-ubuntu-embraces-ai-debian-discusses-banning-all-ai-generated-code/posted in Technology
As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated code
www.xda-developers.com/as-ubuntu-embraces-ai-debian-discusses-banning-all-ai-generated-code/Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
Good. There will be choice.
Replying to @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
I like this attitude. I think if the LLMs weren’t forced down everyone throats, there would be a lot less hostility towards them
Replying to @Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
It’s just so suspiciously and aggressively being shoved down our throats.
Replying to @zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
Yes, it’s not the technology I hate, it’s the people pushing it, demanding it, saying it will replace humans. Those people can fuck right off. Technology exists to serve humans, not the other way around. We are being sold a lie. The technology has some interesting aspects, but the pushers are pushing bullshit.
Replying to @cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
Alright. Hang the fuck on.
Class war.
Technology is incapable of doing anything. It literally can do nothing. It can be used as a tool for sure.
It’s currently being used to fuck you. It’s fucking me. It’s fucking us.
BUT ONLY AT THE DIRECTION OF BILLIONAIRES
Replying to @Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
Class War
You can say that again.
Replying to @SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
Class warfare.
Replying to @ubergeek@lemmy.today
What is good for?
Replying to @Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
Tools are labour made solid. They’re built by workers, and used by other workers in order to be more productive. Unlike a worker, a tool can be owned, which is why the owner class will always prefer more of the “skill” in production come from tools and processes, even at the cost of some craft or quality. Because they get more control.
Anyway LLMs are like a knowledge tool in this case. A truly devastating weapon in the class war, assuming workers agree to adopt it and help improve it.
Replying to @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
assuming workers agree to adopt it and help improve it.
Or forced by their employer by threat of homelessness
Replying to @Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
I meant collectively, not individually.
Obviously as a solitary worker you’re probably going to have a hard time standing up to your employer.
Replying to @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
Ah I got you