Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

The powers that be want to create artificial shortages of everything we use so they can control us

that’s why no one’s talking about climate change anymore. 1. because it’s obviously bullshit and was only ever going to be used as an excuse to turn every free country into a dictatorship

and 2. because of the massive amounts of electricity and water the data centers will use when they’re built

What? you actually believe in climate change? You must be pretty young. In my lifetime I’ve been told there’s a hole in the ozone layer that’s going to cause the end of the world 30 years ago and that there isn’t going to be any ice in the polar regions by 16 years ago.

But the same people who told me that have gigantic mansions with 4 industrial AC units each on beachfront property who also own multiple private jets. “oh but I bought carbon offsets” No, they get to write that off on their taxes, WE paid for their indulgences

It’s like a church charging YOU for an indulgence that someone else gets to benefit from

Replying to @⁨ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org⁩

I’m an Australian, The hole in the ozone layer was a real threat and my skin was definitely negatively affected by the amount of UV I was exposed to. When it was publicised, we saw a social and commercial shift in use of CFCs.

Aerosol cans with CFCs were removed and recycled (probably generating more waste, but whatever).

Mechanics and technicians working on A/Cs and fridges were much more careful with refrigerant.

10 years later, when the Hole recovered, we anecdotally observed less cases of severe sunburn. It may have also been a social awareness thing: with more people using Sunscreen et al, but the measurable reducing in UV was undoubtedly also a factor.

The benefit of removing airborne heavy metals (Pb-based paint and exhaust) is less measurable,but I feel that people with less exposure in their lifetime were more cognitive.

I also deal with a few people in my life who are CC denialists. They are also Y2K denialists so maybe they were exposed to significantly more lead paint than me…

Replying to @⁨ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org⁩

In my lifetime I’ve been told there’s a hole in the ozone layer

I won’t dignify the rest of that sentence by quoting any further. You have literally the entire world’s knowledge at your fingertips and instead you sit there being a fucking moron.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol - a problem being fixed doesn’t mean there was never a problem.

en.wikipedia.orgMontreal Protocol - Wikipedia

Replying to @⁨ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org⁩

TF are you on about. We’re in the middle of the strongest El Nino ever recorded. We have giant uncontrollable wildfires all over the planet, and they are getting more and more common. France used to get a major wildfire every few decades, now it’s like every 2 to 3 years. Europe keeps breaking temperature records basically every summer now.

I can keep going. You are just a dumbass that lives under a rock if you can’t see what’s happening around you.

Replying to @⁨ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org⁩

I’ve lived in Florida & we didn’t have 95F temperatures every single day in August 40 years ago when I was a kid. I was actually able to remain outside all day without getting heat exhaustion. A fucking **glacier **just melted in Nepal and the resulting flood killed hundreds.

You’re either completely delusional or you’re so full of shit, it’s coming out your ears.

Replying to @⁨floofloof@lemmy.ca⁩

He’s not the only one, there are a bunch of companies that want to launch fleets of satellites. I read a recent article that said in the very near future, only about one out of every 15 visible “stars” will be natural.

Since the beginning of time, every living creature, including every evolutionary stage of mankind, have looked at the sky in wonder, awe, navigation, science, calendars, romance, beauty, religion, etc. Gazing into the cosmos has been a core human experience for trillions of people since the beginning of humankind, and now these Sociopathic Oligarchs want to STEAL that from every future human, just so they can have a little more money.

Replying to @⁨CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de⁩

I had an old colleague who was an engineer for Emerson Electric for most of his career. Emerson started as an electric motor manufacturer and eventually got into making just about EVERYTHING. I have a house from the 70’s that originally had fans, garbage disposals, heaters, light switches etc. All made by Emerson. Even different branded appliances using Emerson components.

One time I asked my former colleague what Emerson still makes. He just smirked and said, “Money.” I knew what he meant. I work in manufacturing and as far as I can see, innovation is dead. Because the goal is no longer to design a solution to a problem and (hopefully) profit from it. The goal is to profit. Period. As quickly and cheaply as possible.

So now, all the old people who knew how to design things are gone. And young people are not going into electronics or mechanical engineering because no one is hiring. And who really wants to spend their whole career having to answer to people who don’t care about building cool shit.

Tech has a similar problem.

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

The “backlash” is half hearted and also sensationalised a little in the media.

People have not come together to meaningfully boycott these platforms. Boycott is the language these capitalists understand.

I do not understand why people still use meta platforms, for example. We could level these companies quickly. The excuse that “everyone else I know is there” is wilful paralysis: waiting for someone else to go first. And that’s why these tech oligarchs are confident. They’re probably right to be.

Replying to @⁨disorderly@lemmy.world⁩

Depends on the definition of “work”. There’s plenty of people I had on Facebook that I no longer talk to because I don’t use Facebook. To be clear, my Facebook still exists. It’s there to face tank all the family photos my MIL shares. That’s the only reason the account still exists at all.

That’s technically working for me.

But lots of people are just addicted and Facebook or insta or messenger scratches an itch for them.

Replying to @⁨FaceDeer@fedia.io⁩

And here I’ve tried generative LLMs about once a year and every time I go “what the fuck are people smoking to think this is good”.

I think everyone insisting all this stuff is providing value are legitimately idiots who haven’t spent even a half second thinking for themselves or about the future or the quality of their work.

I wish I was more dumb and saw these products working like you insist and didn’t have to spend half my time rejecting AI slop PRs that genuinely don’t address anything.

Replying to @⁨mushroommunk@lemmy.today⁩

The amount of effort it requires to create a useable work flow built around a genAI llm as the core instead of just a tool in the work flow is absurd.

It basically takes three times the effort to get good results out of it when compared to doing it the old fashion way.

And both require you to still actually understand art to actually produce good results. You can’t just tell an ai to shit out a picture and have it be good. No more then you can tell an artist to just shit out a picture and have it be good.

Both require you to actually put effort in, go though the process and make mistakes fix them. Go back and forth and test ideas.

And that’s the fundamental problem. GenAI is only good enough to at best do the equivalent of a rushed first draft with flat colors. It’s “good enough” not actually good.

And the sort of people using genai arnt the sort of people who are going to go back and edit or clean up the picture. To test and try different things. Hell they aren’t even going to be the sort that custom tunes their model to actually produce what they want.

They just take what ever generic shit model they can find and run with it.

The difference between a generic model and custom trained one is night and day after all. But again the fucking idiots using gen AI ain’t gonna bother to do that let alone know how.

Prompt jockeys are the least qualified people to use genAI. It’s comical.

Replying to @⁨FaceDeer@fedia.io⁩

Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that they do bring value. If all you need is a car, any car, would you buy a “used, in great condition, original owner selling” F-15 that comes with a subscription to use the flaps and work the landing gear?

Your comment is complete and utter bullshit.

Do the services work? Most of them do what is expected, yes. But to have them sqeezing me at every point, and looking as far up my ass as the camera will go to use something that works is just fucking moronic.

Replying to an earlier post

I quit all Meta products 3 years ago. Apart from Marketplace every now and then, I don’t miss anything from their plarform, anything at all. I have also quit Google completely (even google play which I replaced with Aurora and F-Droid.). That has been OK as well (I moved most of my common apps to their web based equivalent). Every time i have a chance to mention it to folks around, without being the wise ass out there, I do it. People are just ignorant about the alternatives, this message comes across slowly, one chap at a time..

Replying to @⁨Seimhe@lemmy.world⁩

For the most part, there’s nothing to boycott yet. Showing up to council meetings by the dozens, imploring them to say No to the data centers they’ve already been bribed to accept, is the same action, done preemptively. Boycotts come later, when the data centers are actually open.

I’m aware that some are already operational, but they are a fraction of what these predators want to build.

Right now, the move is to let them know that we don’t want this, and there will be consequences for supporting data centers. Then vote them out in the next election, and make it very vocal why.

And in small towns and counties, where the council members also operate businesses, those businesses need to be boycotted. You don’t get to inflict existential damage on this town and it’s citizens, without feeling retribution for it. I hope your bribe was fat enough to sustain you after your business crashes, because that’s the choice you made.

Replying to @⁨Drusas@fedia.io⁩

Not per se but yes. You’re thinking too big.

Negative feedback might slow down adaptation but that’s about all that’s going to happen.

Mark Zuckerberg had to testify in front of congress for the first time about privacy issues back in 2018. That’s almost a decade ago. Look at them now.

Ticktock, Facebook and Google are all still around and thriving. ChatGPT is the #1 free app in the App Store. Google Chrome is the number one web browser. Genuine question, what tech been stopped because of the detriments?

Replying to @⁨404found@lemmy.zip⁩

Testifying in front of Congress doesn’t mean anything. That’s just a dog & pony show meant to placate the rubes. NOTHING ever happens as a result.

Look at Tickemaster/ Live Nation. They e had to explain themselves a number of times to Congress over the last 30 years, and they’ve only gotten bigger and more predatory. It finally took all those politicians trying to get Taylor Swift tickets for their screeching daughters that made them angry enough to finally do something about it. They are finally having a trial about it, but it’s still unclear if they’ll feel any consequences or make any changes.

Replying to @⁨404found@lemmy.zip⁩

There’s nothing fundamentally flawed about its core. That’s been proven repeatedly in the medical and biochemical fields.

Full stop. There is zero argument here. If you think there is one you are too ignorant to be even remotely making a informed claim.

The problem is the misuse, lies, abuse and snake oil that is being peddled. That’s not a problem with the tech. That’s a problem with the people.

Strip out the lies and bullshit those fucking retards are trying to claim and your left with a perfectly fine tool that when used correctly is extremely helpful and doesn’t actively fuck the environment.

Replying to @⁨Holytimes@sh.itjust.works⁩

There is zero argument here. If you think there is one you are too ignorant to be even remotely making a informed claim.

"I can't handle conversations with people who might disagree with me." - Holytimes

Your naivete in thinking that human abuse is not par for the course--and something which needs to be expected and anticipated--is not helpful to your argument, either.

Replying to @⁨Drusas@fedia.io⁩

This is the argument I’ve always had about nuclear energy. Sure it works great in other countries, but in America the plants will be built by corporations whose ONLY priority is profit, and they will cut corner after corner, and legally bribe government regulators to do nothing about it, until it fails. It is inevitable, and we ALL know it, which is why nobody really advocates too hard for nuclear power in America. We all know how fucked up it would be.

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

Nah.

Where is the backlash?

Data center and Flock protestors are cheered as heroes, and finding viral fame. Grifty content farms have sprung up to churn out anti-tech memes because the genre is so popular.

Facebook. Twitter. YouTube, Reddit.

Doesn’t matter how angry they get, they will ALWAYS go back to the very spaces those AI datacenter companies own.

Replying to @⁨inari@piefed.zip⁩

They’re not making a tool for you to use, they are making a machine to replace you. You are not part of the plan. You are not part of the model. They are not working on a consumer product. Boycotts and the like will have no effect, the “consumer experience” for these things is just an externality, a smoke screen to pacify people into thinking it’s a commercial software for consumers. It’s not. People and society are merely a threshold to be hurdled.