PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today
⁨13⁩d

U.S. Citizen Who Deleted Phone’s Data Says His Prosecution Puts Privacy at Risk

www.nytimes.com/2026/08/21/us/politics/samuel-tunick-deleted-phone-felony.html?unlocked_article_code=1.8FA.T83N.rt6VsIiSCYb2&amp%3Bsmid=url-share
910548
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
zane@zane@infosec.pub
⁨12⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

There’s an easy legal loophole.

When you seize their phone, tell them your passcode is explicitly not the destruction code, and do not answer any more questions besides insisting this.

When they inevitability try to put in the only thing you mentioned, its entirely their fault for the erase.

Your milage may vary depending on financial class.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
SpaceCowboy@SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨zane@infosec.pub⁩

When you seize their phone, tell them your passcode is explicitly not the destruction code, and do not answer any more questions besides insisting this.

I feel like there might be a couple of things you have the the wrong way around in this sentence.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Heide@Heide@lemmy.world
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca⁩

The destruction code: 4321

“Well, the code definitely isn’t 4321”

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨27⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨20:18⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
zane@zane@infosec.pub
⁨9⁩d

Replying to @⁨Heide@lemmy.world⁩

Exactly.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs