posted in Technology
Woman claims her stepfather used Grok to transform childhood photo into explicit imagery
techcrunch.com/2026/08/15/woman-claims-her-stepfather-used-grok-to-transform-childhood-photo-into-explicit-imagery/posted in Technology
Woman claims her stepfather used Grok to transform childhood photo into explicit imagery
techcrunch.com/2026/08/15/woman-claims-her-stepfather-used-grok-to-transform-childhood-photo-into-explicit-imagery/Two things, 1. I’m a little confused by all the “she claims” and “alleged” language. I think it would be easy to verify the images exist, in which case the only claims up in the air is who actually created the images, and 2. I feel like if we lived in a healthy society, people would say “wow that’s what these tools are being used for? Then I swear off of them until they can be made safe at a minimum.” The degree to which people just dgaf will never not be shocking to me, but they especially dgaf what happens to women and children
I don’t use AI, so I guess I’m the person you wish existed?
But this is already against numerous laws, Elon is a felon in multiple countries because of Grok’s paid csam generation, it’s an illegal business model.
The rich have successfully diverged from the legal system.
Yep, and Elon Musk faces legal trouble in EU countries like France. As our country collapses, he may become unable to shield himself from the consequences of his crimes.
The UK had a prime minister who made his reputation as a prosecutor. He didn’t do shiiiiit about grok.
Politicians work for money, and it’s an open auction.
The UK is no longer an EU country.
I definitely didn’t mean that I wish there was just one individual person who swore off AI haha I’m definitely aware that is a thing, but I’m glad to hear it anyway