PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today
⁨2⁩d

AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?

www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/13/ai-agents-arent-legally-responsible-for-any-harm-that-they-cause-experts-say-so-who-is
3310378
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
LemmyPlaceDN@LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub
edited⁨2⁩d

Replying to @⁨sanitation@lemmy.today⁩

I see a lot of oversimplifying analogies in the comments, but in my opinion none of them take into account that users of AI don’t know how it works or its risks, and some AI like Grok offers inherently problematic and potentially harmful/illegal functionality

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
BradleyUffner@BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
edited⁨2⁩d

Replying to @⁨LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub⁩

People don’t really know how their cars work either, but they are still responsible for crimes they commit with them.

Well, except for running over cyclists. They are allowed to do that.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
lemming741@lemming741@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

Cars aren’t a good analogy- they generally do what you command them to do in a predictable way.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
BradleyUffner@BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

(cough)Tesla(cough)

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨13⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨23:23⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
lemming741@lemming741@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

That actually is a better comparison lol

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs