PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

vegeta@vegeta@lemmy.world
⁨17⁩d

DEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'

www.theregister.com/security/2026/07/28/def-con-bans-meta-style-pervert-glasses/5279763
theregisterDEF CON bans Meta-style 'pervert glasses'More organizers prohibit camera-equipped specs, even with prescription lenses
21101004
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
nonentity@nonentity@sh.itjust.works
⁨16⁩d

Replying to @⁨vegeta@lemmy.world⁩

I’d like to know how well they handle being exposed to IR and/or UV LED flares.

Once that experiment has been performed, try a targeted laser turret.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Ludrol@Ludrol@szmer.info
⁨16⁩d

Replying to @⁨nonentity@sh.itjust.works⁩

Human eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.

⁨Jul⁩ ⁨30⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨08:39⁩en
4000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
nonentity@nonentity@sh.itjust.works
⁨16⁩d

Replying to @⁨Ludrol@szmer.info⁩

I meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
oyzmo@oyzmo@lemmy.world
⁨16⁩d

Replying to @⁨Ludrol@szmer.info⁩

Lidar would probably do the trick

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Godric@Godric@lemmy.world
⁨16⁩d

Replying to @⁨Ludrol@szmer.info⁩

I’m already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don’t have to keep convincing me

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
muusemuuse@muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
⁨15⁩d

Replying to @⁨Ludrol@szmer.info⁩

So what? They were okay with wearing glasses anyway.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs