PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

beep@beep@piefed.world
⁨19⁩d

US prosecutors charge Atlanta man after GrapheneOS phone wipes itself during airport search

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1289238/us-prosecutors-charge-atlanta-man-after-grapheneos-phone-wipes-itself-during-airport-sea

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/23/cop-city-protester-phone
the GuardianUS government targets Cop City protester over phone operating systemConcern over US effort to prosecute Sam Tunick, accused by authorities of wiping his phone using GrapheneOS
1310333
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
NocturnalMorning@NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
⁨18⁩d

Replying to @⁨beep@piefed.world⁩

Get fucked, it’s enshrined in the U.S. constitution against unreasonable searches and seizures through the 4th ammendment. You are not obligated to incriminate yourself in anyway.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
kryptonianCodeMonkey@kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
⁨17⁩d

Replying to @⁨NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world⁩

The right against self incriminating is the 5th amendment. And he’s being charged for destroying evidence, not for not providing it. But I love the spirit.

⁨Jul⁩ ⁨29⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨01:30⁩en
2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
NocturnalMorning@NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
⁨17⁩d

Replying to @⁨kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world⁩

I specifically called out the searches and seizures ammendment bcz that’s what this is about.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
buddascrayon@buddascrayon@lemmy.world
⁨17⁩d

Replying to @⁨kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world⁩

I believe they’re citing two different rights in the Bill of Rights. They mention the Fourth amendment which provides against unwarranted search and seizure and then as an addendum they allude to the fifth amendment which provides against self-incrimination.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs