posted in Technology
I Reviewed Late-2000s Digital Cameras. Allow Me to Remind You Why We All Switched to iPhones.
finally, a "what to buy" article that says "don't buy"
www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/iphone-camera-vs-old-school-point-and-shoot/
Replying to @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
I still have an iPhone and I prefer the pictures my Fuji Finepix took back in the 2000s. It didn’t put that weird fisheye effect on landscapes that make background objects look like they’re a kilometre away when they were only a few meters away. I’m still surprised by how good those pictures are, and the way the lens automatically extends and retracts is just joyful. I never think that of my iPhone.
The pictures are more grainy, and have other shortcomings. But they look like what I saw with my eyes.
Replying to @Seimhe@lemmy.world
I had a fuji finepix around 2010. It was probably user error, but I could not get action shots. Anytime with movement was always blurry, even when I set it for action. For more still shots, the pictures were great, but I wasn’t sad to stop using it with better phone cameras.
Replying to @BassTurd@lemmy.world
We did some amount of joking around with the camera and I don’t remember getting a blur, but I was able to change settings to achieve it and get some nice effects like when car lights leave long red streaks behind them. I was lucky though, I had someone explain the main settings to me like ISO and shutter speed.
Replying to @Seimhe@lemmy.world
I had decent resources, and even the auto settings should have helped out in some situations, but rare success. I do think there’s a real possibility I had a faulty product, but I never bothered to dig further. Within a year or two phone cameras took the reigns, so I moved on