Google Maps said a hike would take 5 hours. B.C. rescuers pointed out how wrong that was
www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/google-maps-said-a-hike-would-take-5-hours-bc-rescuers-pointed-out-how-wrong-that-was/Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
This is a very rare occasion. In the real hiking community, nobody uses Google maps
Replying to @auzy1@lemmy.world
You don’t need to be part of a real community to know this. Google Maps is good to check opening hours and how many reviews an establishment deleted, not for actually getting anywhere.
Replying to @woelkchen@lemmy.world
Where I live it still works fine. It might not be perfect and it does not work great for longer bike tours (If you actually want nice tours and not just the shortest), but if you’re going by car or train it’s good.
Replying to @MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
if you’re going by car or train it’s good.
Goole’s far superior car navigation app is Waze.
Replying to @woelkchen@lemmy.world
What’s the big difference? I’m using Maps and it does its job. So what cool features does Waze have that Maps doesn’t?
Replying to @JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
For me on many phones over the years the arrow in Google Maps never points into the direction of travel.
Although GMaps at some point integrated some of Waze warnings, Waze offers more and not just speed cameras others mentioned. Broken down car streetside, btw.
I don’t hike, but my experience with regular walking directions is that Google is regularly wrong…because it overestimates how long a trip will take.
Its directions for driving and public transport (at least where it has cooperation of the local public transport agency, as it does where I live) are excellent.
Cycling directions are the only one where I’d say a normal person’s experience is likely to be a bad one, with it regularly taking you on dangerous busy roads rather than nearby quieter streets or bike paths.
So I don’t find it particularly surprising at all that someone who isn’t a regular hiker would make the mistake of relying on it.
Replying to @Zagorath@quokk.au
Walking speed is very subjective though. Realistically, hikers never agree on time it takes, and a lot of it comes down more to experience with your speed. In my case, I’m actually probably stronger than many people going uphill… But, downhill, my feet start to hurt and I get slow quickly.
Replying to @auzy1@lemmy.world
Gravity walking is the missing link, lift your foot and let gravity pull it down. You’ll be going down almost running and it takes barely any energy.
It’s best in places without other humans, as you’re basically a locomotive and it takes time to slow down
Replying to @BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
These were pretty steep stairs. And I have plantar fascitis. With a 20kg pack, not much you can do really
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
The linked video at the end of the article shows the trail, and it’s for sure an expert level trail, full of dangerous sections. The video says the full trail is only 30km long, but they reccommend 2-3 days, it’s full of steep sections, cliffs at the side, false trails leading nowhere, unstable terrain, bears… They were lucky they actually didn’t get seriously injured.
Replying to @Supercrunchy@programming.dev
There’s always a few stories every year about people nearly dying trying to climb mount Snowdon in Wales, and while it’s definitely no hill it’s also not exactly K2. The problem is that they try and climb a mountain called Snowdon in flip flops and short shorts, because it’s warm at the base.
Replying to @echodot@feddit.uk
The mountain is called Yr Wyddfa. Its previous name was Snowdon, though the railway kept the old name.
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
May I recommens CoMaps. Offline pro privacy and has trails.
Replying to @Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
OsmAnd. It can show public hike and bike paths, but UI takes time to get used to.
Replying to @lietuva@lemmy.world
CoMaps is based off OsmAnd.
I tried it but it has a very steep learning curve