Replying to @⁨Peppycito@sh.itjust.works⁩

It had nothing to do with profit and everything to do with the tens of billions in debt that was coming due. The merger then ipo was just to dump that bill on the public.

It’s even questionable to me if some of the space x investors will be able to get out above water… Some of those shares were sold at insanely high values then diluted. Fuck them all of course, but seems likely all this ipo achieves is another year or so of runway for the ponzi

Replying to @⁨Peppycito@sh.itjust.works⁩

I disagree. That part is actually a somewhat reasonable business (though partially held up by public funds through contracts). The issue isn’t what part is profitable. The issue is what part is getting all the investment and speculation. SpaceX was probably still overvalued for a space company, but they were doing something with measurable tangible value. The AI side is pure promise, and it’s only speculation, and the speculation is wild. It’s valued higher than something that’s actually making profit.

Replying to @⁨Cethin@lemmy.zip⁩

I get what you’re getting at, but I’d argue that we should look holistically at spacex. If their business model is launching a bazillion satellites and making a bazillion dollars we have to look at the entire launch complex as operating capital of starlink and spaceai. It all depends on starship launching a bazillion times a day so we should include development costs of starship as costs of starlink. The need for these businesses are necessary because the boom in private bookings of rocket launches that was anticipated with cheap launch services hasn’t materialized and so they have an airport and planes without passengers.

I ain’t no rocket economist but it seems “all the money” that starlink makes arent enough.

Replying to @⁨Simulation6@sopuli.xyz⁩

For the IPO I think only 7% of the value of the company was for their space related activities (what they are actually doing). 93% of the value was for the non existent AI activities.

SpaceX is now a public company valued for its AI potential, so what comes next?

Ars TechnicaSpaceX is now a public company valued for its AI potential, so what comes next?As of today, SpaceX is owned by investors who will want to see it make money.

Replying to @⁨NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world⁩

This is a GOOD TAKE by YOU. The big danger on puts is that you can AT MOST make 100% of the investment if the company collapses completely to $0. If, for whatever reason (the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent), the stock explodes upwards, you can be on the hook for WAY more than 100% if the stock increases dramatically.

Replying to @⁨BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world⁩

Thats not how puts work. Thats shorting the stock directly.

A put is an options contract. You can never lose more than your purchase.

If you pay $5.00 for a Jan $50 strike, you pay $500 (1 contract is 100 shares). As the date comes closer it becomes worth less, but as it approaches $50 or goes below it also becomes worth more. You can make a lot of money on a far out of the money put that goes near or in the money.

If it was $50 in November that put might be worth $40 (x100) so $4,000 and you paid $500.

The put becomes worth nothing if its over $50 by strike date.

Its a much safer way to bet against something than directly shorting.