Replying to an earlier post

Every time I hear of an all electric aircraft of any size, I always wonder what they’re going to do about landing weight.

Every modern transport category jet has a higher takeoff weight than landing weight, because of the simple unavoidable fact that landings are rougher than takeoffs. Taking off, the load gradually comes off of the landing gear, on landing it’s suddenly applied. Jets burn tons, literally tons, of fuel enroute, so they’re considerably lighter on approach. It’s why aircraft have dump valves to jettison fuel overboard in case of forced landing early in the flight.

Batteries don’t get lighter as they’re discharged, so…?

Replying to @⁨captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works⁩

You can rethink the engineering with electric motors.

The planes you are describing are designed assuming they will be lighter on landing because of fuel. So why design them for take off weight?

Electric motors are condusive of blown wing design for example, and would have a unique landing profile. (The plane can land at much slower velocity)

Edit: yeah they’ve moved the engine shroud which allows for lower speeds. Given the same runway you would be able to trim vertical speed.

Replying to an earlier post

Why couldn’t it actually be safer since you could have distributed power centers, across multiple motors?

You could also have hybrid approaches - there is space between not being able to glide and smashing your landing.

I’m just getting at it being a different system so some old assumptions can be reexamined.

Bigger challenge than landing is energy density.

Regardless it’s a very interesting space.

en